PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRDCY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRDCY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRDCY achieves a -3.79% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BRDCY has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 3.53%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


BRDCY

1D
0.94%
1M
5.27%
YTD
-3.79%
6M
-8.76%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
3.53%

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRDCY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRDCY
Bridgestone Corporation
-3.79%36.08%-16.65%18.44%-17.81%30.79%-11.30%-3.65%-17.43%28.75%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BRDCY and ^GSPC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRDCY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRDCY
BRDCY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BRDCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRDCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRDCY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BRDCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRDCY Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRDCY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRDCY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

2.24

-1.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

3.07

-2.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.41

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.93

-2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.70

13.52

-12.82

BRDCY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRDCY Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRDCY and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRDCY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.24

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.73

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.76

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.47

-0.32

Drawdowns

BRDCY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRDCY drawdown since its inception was -45.83%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRDCY and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRDCY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.83%

-56.78%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.16%

-9.10%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.47%

-18.90%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.15%

-25.43%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.83%

-33.92%

-11.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.10%

-0.74%

-13.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.51%

-10.72%

-6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.02%

1.97%

+7.05%

Volatility

BRDCY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.93%. This indicates that BRDCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRDCY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

2.93%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

8.99%

+9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.37%

11.89%

+11.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

16.90%

+5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

18.06%

+4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRDCY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRDCY has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to ^GSPC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRDCY dropped -45.83% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRDCY and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer