PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRCC vs. STZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRCC vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BRC Inc. (BRCC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRCC achieves a 35.14% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's -0.56% return.


BRCC

1D
-3.85%
1M
37.61%
YTD
35.14%
6M
14.50%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
-35.11%
5Y*
-31.23%
10Y*

STZ

1D
-0.99%
1M
-8.60%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
-21.28%
3Y*
-16.29%
5Y*
-9.16%
10Y*
0.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRCC vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BRCC
BRC Inc.
35.14%-64.98%-12.67%-40.59%-39.80%3.26%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
-0.56%-35.99%-7.11%5.83%-6.43%3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BRCC and STZ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2021

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BRCC:

$173.10M

STZ:

$23.52B

EPS

BRCC:

-$0.09

STZ:

$11.23

PS Ratio

BRCC:

0.35

STZ:

2.59

PB Ratio

BRCC:

3.70

STZ:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRCC:

$417.52M

STZ:

$9.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRCC:

$141.56M

STZ:

$4.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

BRCC:

-$8.22M

STZ:

$3.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRCC vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRCC
BRCC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BRCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

STZ
STZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
STZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
STZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
STZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
STZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRCC vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BRC Inc. (BRCC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRCCSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.90

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

-0.79

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.28

-1.40

+1.12

BRCC vs. STZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRCC and STZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRCCSTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

-0.71

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

-0.38

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.44

-0.86

Drawdowns

BRCC vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRCC drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCC and STZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRCCSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.11%

-67.39%

-30.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.23%

-26.88%

-42.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.81%

-51.28%

-39.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.11%

-51.28%

-46.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.47%

-47.64%

-47.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.74%

-16.57%

-55.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.29%

15.18%

+25.11%

Volatility

BRCC vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

BRC Inc. (BRCC) has a higher volatility of 29.25% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 8.45%. This indicates that BRCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRCCSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.25%

8.45%

+20.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.51%

23.32%

+32.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.36%

30.02%

+50.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.43%

24.46%

+49.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.79%

26.94%

+46.85%

Dividends

BRCC vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

BRCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRCC
BRC Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.02%2.95%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%

Financials

BRCC vs. STZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BRC Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
109.23M
1.92B
(BRCC) Total Revenue
(STZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BRCC vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BRC Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
33.0%
49.0%
Portfolio components
BRCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRC Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.09M and revenue of 109.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

BRCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRC Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32M and revenue of 109.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

BRCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRC Inc. reported a net income of 46.00K and revenue of 109.23M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BRCC and STZ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRCC has higher volatility (29.25%) compared to STZ (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRCC dropped -98.11% vs STZ's -67.39%.

BRCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRCC and STZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer