BRBR vs. SCHG
BRBR (BellRing Brands, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, BRBR returned -21.16%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BRBR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRBR achieves a -67.49% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.78% return.
BRBR
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -18.25%
- YTD
- -67.49%
- 6M
- -72.29%
- 1Y
- -86.02%
- 3Y*
- -38.30%
- 5Y*
- -21.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.74%
BRBR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRBR BellRing Brands, Inc. | -67.49% | -64.52% | 35.92% | 116.19% | -10.13% | 17.36% | 14.19% | 29.03% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.78% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRBR and SCHG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2019 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BRBR and SCHG has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRBR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
BRBR
SCHG
BRBR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BellRing Brands, Inc. (BRBR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.60 | 1.28 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 1.51 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 5.04 | -6.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.19 | 1.60 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.71 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.85 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
BRBR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRBR drawdown since its inception was -89.47%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRBR and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.47% | -34.59% | -54.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.69% | -16.41% | -70.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.47% | -23.39% | -66.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.47% | -34.59% | -54.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.05% | -1.44% | -87.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -5.20% | -14.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.24% | 4.90% | +51.34% |
Volatility
BRBR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
BellRing Brands, Inc. (BRBR) has a higher volatility of 17.82% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that BRBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.82% | 3.61% | +14.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.21% | 11.62% | +53.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.56% | 15.49% | +57.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.86% | 22.26% | +24.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.53% | 21.55% | +24.98% |
Dividends
BRBR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
BRBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRBR BellRing Brands, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRBR and SCHG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRBR has higher volatility (17.82%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRBR dropped -89.47% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRBR and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer