PortfoliosLab logo

BR vs. FLT

Last updated May 27, 2023

Compare and contrast key facts about Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (FLT).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BR or FLT.

Key characteristics


BRFLT
YTD Return12.12%27.26%
1Y Return5.59%-2.75%
5Y Return (Ann)7.06%2.95%
10Y Return (Ann)20.55%10.74%
Sharpe Ratio0.310.01
Daily Std Dev27.82%33.87%
Max Drawdown-59.02%-50.13%

Fundamentals


BRFLT
Market Cap$17.48B$17.19B
EPS$4.67$12.69
PE Ratio26.6118.35
PEG Ratio1.861.18
Revenue (TTM)$5.94B$3.54B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.59B$2.66B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.26B$1.77B

Correlation

0.47
-1.001.00

The correlation between BR and FLT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

BR vs. FLT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BR achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly lower than FLT's 27.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BR has outperformed FLT with an annualized return of 20.55%, while FLT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%December2023FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.17%
24.79%
BR
FLT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs


FleetCor Technologies, Inc.

BR vs. FLT - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while FLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20222021202020192018201720162015201420132012
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.31%2.05%1.36%1.51%1.76%1.90%1.68%2.12%2.41%2.41%2.34%3.62%
FLT
FleetCor Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

BR vs. FLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (FLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioUlcer Index
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
0.31
FLT
FleetCor Technologies, Inc.
0.01

BR vs. FLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BR Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the FLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BR and FLT.


-1.00-0.500.000.50December2023FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.31
0.01
BR
FLT

BR vs. FLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BR drawdown for the period was -26.72%, higher than the maximum FLT drawdown of -45.92%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for BR and FLT


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2023FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-17.15%
-28.92%
BR
FLT

BR vs. FLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) is 7.57%, while FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (FLT) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2023FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.57%
10.26%
BR
FLT