PortfoliosLab logo
BR vs. FLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BR and FLT is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BR vs. FLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (FLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BR:

$27.84B

FLT:

$21.79B

EPS

BR:

$6.66

FLT:

$13.20

PE Ratio

BR:

35.59

FLT:

22.97

PEG Ratio

BR:

1.68

FLT:

1.18

PS Ratio

BR:

4.11

FLT:

5.80

PB Ratio

BR:

11.64

FLT:

6.75

Returns By Period


BR

YTD

5.24%

1M

3.77%

6M

6.04%

1Y

23.05%

5Y*

16.73%

10Y*

18.61%

FLT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BR vs. FLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BR is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BR is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BR is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BR is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BR is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BR is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLT is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLT is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLT is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLT is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLT is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLT is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BR vs. FLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (FLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

BR vs. FLT - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while FLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.45%1.49%1.48%2.04%1.33%1.46%1.66%1.77%1.53%1.90%2.12%2.08%
FLT
FleetCor Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BR vs. FLT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

BR vs. FLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

BR vs. FLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and FleetCor Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.81B
935.25M
(BR) Total Revenue
(FLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items