PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BR vs. CCSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BR vs. CCSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BR achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than CCSI's 57.47% return.


BR

1D
0.99%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-30.57%
6M
-32.60%
1Y
-35.78%
3Y*
1.81%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
11.00%

CCSI

1D
1.99%
1M
24.58%
YTD
57.47%
6M
52.64%
1Y
54.36%
3Y*
-0.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BR vs. CCSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
-30.57%0.27%11.65%56.23%-25.26%8.60%
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
57.47%-8.55%-8.97%-51.25%-7.10%-10.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BR and CCSI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2021

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BR:

$18.03B

CCSI:

$654.26M

EPS

BR:

$9.35

CCSI:

$4.57

PE Ratio

BR:

16.49

CCSI:

7.53

PS Ratio

BR:

2.48

CCSI:

1.89

PB Ratio

BR:

6.40

CCSI:

29.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

BR:

$7.32B

CCSI:

$351.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BR:

$2.29B

CCSI:

$281.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

BR:

$1.98B

CCSI:

$163.09M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BR vs. CCSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BR
BR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CCSI
CCSI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BR vs. CCSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRCCSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.22

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

1.71

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

3.54

-5.05

BR vs. CCSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BR Sharpe Ratio is -1.42, which is lower than the CCSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BR and CCSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRCCSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.42

1.01

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.23

+0.75

Drawdowns

BR vs. CCSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BR drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum CCSI drawdown of -82.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BR and CCSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRCCSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-82.39%

+23.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.55%

-31.90%

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.55%

-67.64%

+22.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.47%

-48.01%

+6.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-49.02%

+40.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.84%

15.39%

+8.45%

Volatility

BR vs. CCSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) is 9.18%, while Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) has a volatility of 26.23%. This indicates that BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRCCSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

26.23%

-17.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.53%

40.50%

-18.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.32%

53.98%

-28.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.41%

56.48%

-33.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.88%

56.48%

-32.60%

Dividends

BR vs. CCSI - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while CCSI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.47%1.66%1.49%1.48%2.04%1.33%1.46%1.66%1.77%1.53%1.90%2.12%
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BR vs. CCSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.95B
88.47M
(BR) Total Revenue
(CCSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BR vs. CCSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
32.1%
80.9%
Portfolio components
BR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 626.90M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

CCSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.57M and revenue of 88.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.

BR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 359.50M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

CCSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.74M and revenue of 88.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

BR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 276.30M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.

CCSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 24.69M and revenue of 88.47M, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BR and CCSI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCSI has higher volatility (26.23%) compared to BR (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BR dropped -59.02% vs CCSI's -82.39%.

CCSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BR and CCSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer