BR vs. CCSI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI).

Performance

BR vs. CCSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BR vs. CCSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	-26.79%	0.27%	11.65%	56.23%	-25.26%	8.60%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.	8.80%	-8.55%	-8.97%	-51.25%	-7.10%	-10.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BR : $19.12B CCSI : $459.68M
EPS BR : $9.04 CCSI : $4.36
PE Ratio BR : 17.96 CCSI : 5.44
PS Ratio BR : 2.67 CCSI : 1.32
PB Ratio BR : 6.64 CCSI : 33.38
Total Revenue (TTM) BR : $7.18B CCSI : $349.70M
Gross Profit (TTM) BR : $2.24B CCSI : $279.10M
EBITDA (TTM) BR : $1.54B CCSI : $162.92M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BR achieves a -26.79% return, which is significantly lower than CCSI's 8.80% return.

BR

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -12.10%
• YTD: -26.79%
• 6M: -31.11%
• 1Y: -31.82%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 12.50%

CCSI

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -21.08%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 6M: -19.17%
• 1Y: 2.86%
• 3Y*: -11.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BR vs. CCSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BR

BR Risk / Return Rank: 5
BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BR Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CCSI

CCSI Risk / Return Rank: 42
CCSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CCSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CCSI Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CCSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CCSI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BR vs. CCSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BR	CCSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	0.06	-1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.74	0.43	-2.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.06	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	0.07	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.86	0.16	-2.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BR vs. CCSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BR Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the CCSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BR and CCSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BR	CCSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.24	0.06	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	-0.36	+0.90

Correlation

The correlation between BR and CCSI is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BR vs. CCSI - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while CCSI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	2.34%	1.66%	1.49%	1.48%	2.04%	1.33%	1.46%	1.66%	1.77%	1.53%	1.90%	2.12%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BR vs. CCSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BR drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum CCSI drawdown of -82.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BR and CCSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BR	CCSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-82.39%	+23.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.21%	-31.90%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.29%	-64.08%	+25.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.69%	-48.68%	+39.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.34%	14.84%	+1.50%

Volatility

BR vs. CCSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) is 9.13%, while Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) has a volatility of 12.94%. This indicates that BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BR	CCSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.13%	12.94%	-3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.66%	36.43%	-17.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.85%	48.75%	-22.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	55.66%	-32.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.64%	55.66%	-32.02%

Financials

BR vs. CCSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 473.60M and revenue of 1.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

CCSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.68M and revenue of 87.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.

BR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 206.00M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

CCSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.76M and revenue of 87.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.1%.

BR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 284.60M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

CCSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 20.50M and revenue of 87.07M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.