BR vs. CACI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and CACI International Inc (CACI).

Performance

BR vs. CACI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and CACI International Inc (CACI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BR vs. CACI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	-27.92%	0.27%	11.65%	56.23%	-25.26%	21.12%	26.28%	30.59%	7.86%	39.10%
CACI CACI International Inc	5.32%	31.86%	24.76%	7.74%	11.66%	7.97%	-0.26%	73.57%	8.83%	6.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BR : $18.83B CACI : $12.43B
EPS BR : $9.04 CACI : $23.41
PE Ratio BR : 17.69 CACI : 23.97
PEG Ratio BR : 1.56 CACI : 4.10
PS Ratio BR : 2.63 CACI : 1.38
PB Ratio BR : 6.54 CACI : 3.00
Total Revenue (TTM) BR : $7.18B CACI : $8.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) BR : $2.24B CACI : $821.79M
EBITDA (TTM) BR : $1.54B CACI : $1.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BR achieves a -27.92% return, which is significantly lower than CACI's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BR has underperformed CACI with an annualized return of 12.32%, while CACI has yielded a comparatively higher 18.06% annualized return.

BR

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -13.75%
• YTD: -27.92%
• 6M: -31.14%
• 1Y: -33.49%
• 3Y*: 4.70%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 12.32%

CACI

• 1D: 3.18%
• 1M: -10.21%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 8.93%
• 1Y: 51.70%
• 3Y*: 23.73%
• 5Y*: 17.68%
• 10Y*: 18.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BR vs. CACI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BR

BR Risk / Return Rank: 4
BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BR Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BR Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CACI

CACI Risk / Return Rank: 84
CACI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CACI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CACI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CACI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CACI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BR vs. CACI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and CACI International Inc (CACI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BR	CACI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.30	1.57	-2.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.86	2.33	-4.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.30	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	2.96	-3.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.99	8.45	-10.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BR vs. CACI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BR Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the CACI Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BR and CACI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BR	CACI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.30	1.57	-2.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.67	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.64	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.40	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between BR and CACI is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BR vs. CACI - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while CACI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	2.38%	1.66%	1.49%	1.48%	2.04%	1.33%	1.46%	1.66%	1.77%	1.53%	1.90%	2.12%
CACI CACI International Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BR vs. CACI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BR drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum CACI drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BR and CACI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BR	CACI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-62.89%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.21%	-17.87%	-22.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.21%	-42.88%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.21%	-42.88%	+2.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.24%	-15.26%	-23.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.70%	-19.07%	+10.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.52%	6.27%	+10.25%

Volatility

BR vs. CACI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) is 9.09%, while CACI International Inc (CACI) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CACI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BR	CACI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.09%	10.33%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.69%	24.94%	-6.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.79%	33.02%	-7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	26.55%	-3.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.64%	28.16%	-4.52%

Financials

BR vs. CACI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and CACI International Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 473.60M and revenue of 1.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

CACI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CACI International Inc reported a gross profit of 206.47M and revenue of 2.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.3%.

BR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 206.00M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

CACI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CACI International Inc reported an operating income of 206.47M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.

BR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 284.60M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

CACI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CACI International Inc reported a net income of 123.86M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.