BPTH vs. RPXIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (BPTH) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX).

RPXIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 2010.

Performance

BPTH vs. RPXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (BPTH) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BPTH vs. RPXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BPTH Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.	-0.00%	-94.83%	-87.47%	-69.34%	-59.95%	7.71%	-56.20%	128.29%	-91.25%	-85.19%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	-13.34%	13.18%	22.55%	51.57%	-47.37%	1.09%	55.28%	32.49%	-4.78%	30.27%

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, BPTH has underperformed RPXIX with an annualized return of -70.18%, while RPXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.

BPTH

• 1D: 5.26%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 6M: 4.17%
• 1Y: -64.69%
• 3Y*: -87.08%
• 5Y*: -78.89%
• 10Y*: -70.18%

RPXIX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -8.04%
• YTD: -13.34%
• 6M: -12.24%
• 1Y: 5.71%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: -1.11%
• 10Y*: 10.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BPTH vs. RPXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPTH

BPTH Risk / Return Rank: 22
BPTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BPTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BPTH Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BPTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BPTH Martin Ratio Rank: 20

RPXIX

RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPTH vs. RPXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (BPTH) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BPTH	RPXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	0.28	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	0.56	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.08	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	0.20	-0.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	0.71	-1.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BPTH vs. RPXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPTH Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the RPXIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPTH and RPXIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BPTH	RPXIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46	0.28	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.59	-0.04	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.43	0.41	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.46	-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between BPTH and RPXIX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BPTH vs. RPXIX - Dividend Comparison

BPTH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPTH Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	10.56%	9.15%	7.22%	0.00%	0.01%	3.79%	6.69%	11.76%	15.17%	9.01%	0.54%	1.72%

Drawdowns

BPTH vs. RPXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPTH drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than RPXIX's maximum drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPTH and RPXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPTH	RPXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-58.56%	-41.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.27%	-15.28%	-61.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.97%	-58.56%	-41.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-100.00%	-58.56%	-41.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-20.17%	-79.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.71%	-11.64%	-77.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	54.28%	4.30%	+49.98%

Volatility

BPTH vs. RPXIX - Volatility Comparison

Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (BPTH) has a higher volatility of 26.92% compared to RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) at 4.87%. This indicates that BPTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPTH	RPXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.92%	4.87%	+22.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	105.77%	10.79%	+94.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.33%	21.14%	+119.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	133.72%	26.37%	+107.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	164.24%	24.71%	+139.53%