PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BPT.L vs. BAM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BPT.L and BAM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

BPT.L vs. BAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgepoint Group plc (BPT.L) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
20.48%
47.32%
BPT.L
BAM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BPT.L:

1.13

BAM:

1.96

Sortino Ratio

BPT.L:

1.70

BAM:

2.55

Omega Ratio

BPT.L:

1.21

BAM:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

BPT.L:

0.68

BAM:

4.40

Martin Ratio

BPT.L:

3.65

BAM:

9.35

Ulcer Index

BPT.L:

11.09%

BAM:

5.66%

Daily Std Dev

BPT.L:

35.87%

BAM:

26.99%

Max Drawdown

BPT.L:

-68.64%

BAM:

-20.47%

Current Drawdown

BPT.L:

-27.36%

BAM:

-1.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BPT.L:

£3.21B

BAM:

$98.10B

EPS

BPT.L:

£0.08

BAM:

$1.33

PE Ratio

BPT.L:

47.18

BAM:

45.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

BPT.L:

£158.80M

BAM:

$1.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BPT.L:

£85.90M

BAM:

$359.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

BPT.L:

£91.20M

BAM:

$765.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPT.L achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than BAM's 11.28% return.


BPT.L

YTD

4.11%

1M

3.94%

6M

26.32%

1Y

38.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BAM

YTD

11.28%

1M

6.07%

6M

52.87%

1Y

53.92%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BPT.L vs. BAM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPT.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BPT.L is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BPT.L is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BPT.L is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BPT.L is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BPT.L is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BPT.L is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAM is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAM is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAM is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAM is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAM is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAM is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BPT.L vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgepoint Group plc (BPT.L) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BPT.L, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.281.98
The chart of Sortino ratio for BPT.L, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.862.57
The chart of Omega ratio for BPT.L, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.231.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for BPT.L, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.784.41
The chart of Martin ratio for BPT.L, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.839.24
BPT.L
BAM

The current BPT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the BAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPT.L and BAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.28
1.98
BPT.L
BAM

Dividends

BPT.L vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison

BPT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 240.13%, more than BAM's 2.52% yield.


TTM202420232022
BPT.L
Bridgepoint Group plc
240.13%250.00%300.86%400.84%
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
2.52%2.80%3.19%0.00%

Drawdowns

BPT.L vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPT.L drawdown since its inception was -68.64%, which is greater than BAM's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPT.L and BAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.73%
-1.73%
BPT.L
BAM

Volatility

BPT.L vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison

Bridgepoint Group plc (BPT.L) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) have volatilities of 9.40% and 9.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.40%
9.45%
BPT.L
BAM

Financials

BPT.L vs. BAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bridgepoint Group plc and Brookfield Asset Management Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BPT.L values in GBp, BAM values in USD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab