PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPIRX vs. FLSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund (BPIRX) and Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPIRX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLSPX's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BPIRX has underperformed FLSPX with an annualized return of 7.41%, while FLSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.


BPIRX

1D
0.61%
1M
2.56%
YTD
5.63%
6M
5.03%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
7.41%

FLSPX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.78%
YTD
10.75%
6M
9.75%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPIRX
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund
5.63%14.90%13.49%4.75%6.48%23.74%-8.25%12.60%-10.59%10.10%
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
10.75%16.15%27.96%14.00%-11.49%20.56%-0.23%13.03%-3.96%19.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BPIRX and FLSPX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2015

0.78

The correlation between BPIRX and FLSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPIRX vs. FLSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPIRX
BPIRX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BPIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BPIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSPX
FLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund (BPIRX) and Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPIRXFLSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.23

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

13.61

-4.20

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FLSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPIRX and FLSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPIRX drawdown since its inception was -30.59%, which is greater than FLSPX's maximum drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPIRX and FLSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPIRXFLSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.59%

-27.07%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-8.73%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-16.23%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-20.01%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.59%

-27.07%

-3.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.95%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-5.67%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.07%

-0.44%

Volatility

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund (BPIRX) is 2.62%, while Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that BPIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPIRXFLSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

4.73%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

9.90%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.38%

12.63%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.45%

13.47%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.70%

13.69%

-1.99%

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPIRX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FLSPX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPIRX vs. FLSPX - Dividend Comparison

BPIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, more than FLSPX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPIRX
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund
10.08%10.65%11.38%11.29%20.90%12.51%0.00%2.28%5.50%0.00%0.00%3.88%
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
4.09%4.32%17.39%8.41%2.81%5.55%0.09%0.96%1.26%6.78%2.52%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPIRX and FLSPX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSPX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to BPIRX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPIRX dropped -30.59% vs FLSPX's -27.07%.

FLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPIRX and FLSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer