FLOT vs. BOXX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX).
FLOT and BOXX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Jun 14, 2011. BOXX is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Dec 27, 2022.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLOT or BOXX.
Key characteristics
| FLOT | BOXX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.70% | 4.47% |
| 1Y Return | 6.61% | 5.28% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 8.19 | 13.84 |
| Sortino Ratio | 15.02 | 47.40 |
| Omega Ratio | 4.57 | 10.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 15.02 | 139.71 |
| Martin Ratio | 162.39 | 727.95 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.04% | 0.01% |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.82% | 0.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.54% | -0.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.02% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOT and BOXX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLOT vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than BOXX's 4.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLOT vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLOT and BOXX have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLOT vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLOT vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison
FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than BOXX's 0.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.45% | 0.97% | 0.53% | 0.44% | 0.48% |
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLOT vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and BOXX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLOT vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a higher volatility of 0.41% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.09%. This indicates that FLOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.