PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. THNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 44.05% return.


BOTZ

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.92%
YTD
11.15%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*

THNQ

1D
-2.20%
1M
22.90%
YTD
44.05%
6M
40.99%
1Y
79.25%
3Y*
37.91%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
11.15%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%55.11%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
44.05%29.83%18.82%56.81%-39.84%9.10%58.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and THNQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.83

The correlation between BOTZ and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTZ
THNQ

Industrials

48.6%
1.1%

Technology

31.8%
71.6%

Healthcare

9.0%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
9.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
10.3%

Financial Services

0.9%
1.3%

Energy

0.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Industrials

BOTZ
48.6%
THNQ
1.1%

Technology

BOTZ
31.8%
THNQ
71.6%

Healthcare

BOTZ
9.0%
THNQ
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTZ
6.1%
THNQ
9.2%

Communication Services

BOTZ
4.5%
THNQ
10.3%

Financial Services

BOTZ
0.9%
THNQ
1.3%

Energy

BOTZ
0.5%
THNQ

-

Consumer Defensive

BOTZ
0.0%
THNQ

-

Basic Materials

BOTZ
0.0%
THNQ

-

Utilities

BOTZ
0.0%
THNQ

-

Real Estate

BOTZ

-

THNQ
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTZTHNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

4.33

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

14.31

-9.04

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTZTHNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

3.01

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.62

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.83

-0.39

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than THNQ's maximum drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and THNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZTHNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-50.56%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-18.39%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-29.88%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-50.56%

-4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-2.20%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-15.07%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

5.56%

+0.07%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 7.77%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZTHNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

8.50%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

20.69%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

26.47%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

29.09%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

28.66%

-2.93%

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOTZ and THNQ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than THNQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.14%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and THNQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THNQ has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to BOTZ (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 17.90% vs 3.18% for BOTZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOTZ and THNQ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.14% for THNQ.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while THNQ is Technology Equities. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts.

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and THNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer