PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BOOT vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BOOTETN
YTD Return73.18%52.12%
1Y Return75.81%62.35%
3Y Return (Ann)3.16%30.28%
5Y Return (Ann)26.18%34.43%
10Y Return (Ann)20.78%21.72%
Sharpe Ratio1.822.21
Sortino Ratio2.352.76
Omega Ratio1.341.40
Calmar Ratio1.823.06
Martin Ratio11.879.89
Ulcer Index7.11%6.13%
Daily Std Dev46.35%27.42%
Max Drawdown-83.73%-68.95%
Current Drawdown-20.79%-2.71%

Fundamentals


BOOTETN
Market Cap$4.11B$145.82B
EPS$4.98$9.41
PE Ratio27.0339.21
PEG Ratio1.723.21
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.76B$24.61B
Gross Profit (TTM)$648.13M$9.52B
EBITDA (TTM)$276.20M$4.99B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between BOOT and ETN is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BOOT vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a 73.18% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's 52.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BOOT having a 20.78% annualized return and ETN not far ahead at 21.72%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.93%
10.25%
BOOT
ETN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BOOT vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOOT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 11.87, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.87
ETN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ETN, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ETN, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.76
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ETN, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ETN, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ETN, currently valued at 9.89, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.89

BOOT vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.82
2.21
BOOT
ETN

Dividends

BOOT vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.04%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%2.21%

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-20.79%
-2.71%
BOOT
ETN

Volatility

BOOT vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 23.72% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 8.60%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
23.72%
8.60%
BOOT
ETN

Financials

BOOT vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items