BOOT vs. ETN

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a 92.78% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's 41.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed ETN with an annualized return of 23.23%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively lower 20.47% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 5.91%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.