BON vs. VOO
BON (Bon Natural Life Limited) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past year, BON returned -27.49% vs 28.04% for VOO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BON vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BON achieves a -22.02% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.
BON
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- -22.02%
- 6M
- -30.73%
- 1Y
- -27.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
BON vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BON Bon Natural Life Limited | -22.02% | -93.31% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 18.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BON and VOO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BON vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
BON
VOO
BON vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bon Natural Life Limited (BON) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BON | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.43 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 3.16 | -3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 14.73 | -15.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BON | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 2.39 | -2.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | 0.89 | -1.49 |
Drawdowns
BON vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BON drawdown since its inception was -96.73%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BON and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BON | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.73% | -33.99% | -62.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.32% | -8.90% | -39.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.56% | -0.70% | -95.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.22% | -3.69% | -88.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.40% | 1.91% | +27.49% |
Volatility
BON vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Bon Natural Life Limited (BON) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that BON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BON | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.44% | 2.84% | +9.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.39% | 8.90% | +20.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.34% | 11.80% | +52.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.86% | 16.81% | +134.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.86% | 18.01% | +132.85% |
Dividends
BON vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
BON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BON Bon Natural Life Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BON and VOO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BON has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BON dropped -96.73% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BON and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer