BOKF vs. RF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).

Performance

BOKF vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOKF vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOKF BOK Financial Corporation	8.62%	13.77%	27.19%	-15.25%	0.59%	57.59%	-18.97%	22.09%	-18.98%	13.57%
RF Regions Financial Corporation	-2.69%	21.99%	27.00%	-5.69%	2.33%	39.39%	-1.61%	33.35%	-20.59%	22.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BOKF : $7.80B RF : $22.99B
EPS BOKF : $9.25 RF : $2.42
PE Ratio BOKF : 13.85 RF : 10.80
PS Ratio BOKF : 2.41 RF : 2.42
PB Ratio BOKF : 1.32 RF : 1.30
Total Revenue (TTM) BOKF : $3.33B RF : $9.61B
Gross Profit (TTM) BOKF : $2.12B RF : $7.17B
EBITDA (TTM) BOKF : $793.89M RF : $2.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOKF achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BOKF has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 11.82%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.02% annualized return.

BOKF

• 1D: 2.31%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 16.13%
• 1Y: 25.67%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

RF

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 17.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BOKF vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOKF

BOKF Risk / Return Rank: 71
BOKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BOKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BOKF Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BOKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BOKF Martin Ratio Rank: 74

RF

RF Risk / Return Rank: 69
RF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOKF vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOKF	RF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.85	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.28	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.47	+0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	3.71	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOKF vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the RF Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOKF and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOKF	RF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	0.85	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.29	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.47	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.17	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BOKF and RF is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOKF vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

BOKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than RF's 4.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOKF BOK Financial Corporation	1.87%	1.98%	2.09%	2.53%	2.05%	1.98%	2.99%	2.30%	2.59%	1.92%	2.08%	2.81%
RF Regions Financial Corporation	4.00%	5.12%	4.17%	4.54%	3.43%	2.98%	3.85%	3.44%	3.44%	1.82%	1.78%	2.40%

Drawdowns

BOKF vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOKF drawdown since its inception was -86.36%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOKF and RF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOKF	RF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.36%	-92.65%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.05%	-18.45%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.75%	-40.99%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.97%	-60.73%	-4.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.79%	-14.79%	+9.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-31.19%	+12.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.23%	7.31%	-1.08%

Volatility

BOKF vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is 4.20%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that BOKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOKF	RF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	6.68%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.70%	18.83%	-1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.44%	29.81%	-3.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.34%	31.63%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.67%	36.02%	-2.35%

Financials

BOKF vs. RF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BOK Financial Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BOKF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 560.15M and revenue of 840.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.

BOKF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 199.09M and revenue of 840.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

BOKF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported a net income of 177.30M and revenue of 840.68M, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.