BOKF vs. RF
BOKF (BOK Financial Corporation) and RF (Regions Financial Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, BOKF returned 10.98%/yr vs 17.26%/yr for RF. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOKF vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOKF achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than RF's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BOKF has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 10.98%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.
BOKF
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 46.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
RF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.26%
BOKF vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOKF BOK Financial Corporation | 13.26% | 13.77% | 27.19% | -15.25% | 0.59% | 57.59% | -18.97% | 22.09% | -18.98% | 13.57% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 8.13% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOKF and RF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 1991 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, BOKF and RF have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BOKF:
$7.98B
RF:
$24.96B
BOKF:
$9.92
RF:
$2.51
BOKF:
13.39
RF:
11.44
BOKF:
3.00
RF:
2.65
BOKF:
1.34
RF:
1.43
BOKF:
$2.74B
RF:
$9.62B
BOKF:
$1.83B
RF:
$7.29B
BOKF:
$806.38M
RF:
$2.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOKF vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank
BOKF
RF
BOKF vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOKF | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 1.89 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | 4.49 | +5.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOKF vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOKF drawdown since its inception was -86.36%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOKF and RF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOKF | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.36% | -92.65% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -18.45% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.72% | -32.35% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.75% | -40.99% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.97% | -60.73% | -4.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -5.32% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -31.05% | +12.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 7.75% | -3.31% |
Volatility
BOKF vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) have volatilities of 6.77% and 6.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOKF | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 6.65% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 17.85% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.45% | 24.68% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.03% | 31.34% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.53% | 35.91% | -2.38% |
Dividends
BOKF vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
BOKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than RF's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOKF BOK Financial Corporation | 1.85% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.53% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 2.59% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 2.81% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.69% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Financials
BOKF vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BOK Financial Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOKF vs. RF - Profitability Comparison
BOKF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 208.83M and revenue of 211.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.
BOKF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 194.53M and revenue of 211.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.1%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 714.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.
BOKF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported a net income of 155.77M and revenue of 211.27M, resulting in a net margin of 73.7%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 559.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOKF and RF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOKF has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to RF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOKF dropped -86.36% vs RF's -92.65%.
BOKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOKF and RF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer