BOKF vs. AGM
BOKF (BOK Financial Corporation) and AGM (Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BOKF in Banks - Regional, AGM in Credit Services. Over the past 10 years, BOKF returned 10.37%/yr vs 22.13%/yr for AGM. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOKF vs. AGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BOKF having a 17.67% return and AGM slightly higher at 17.70%. Over the past 10 years, BOKF has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 10.37%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 22.13% annualized return.
BOKF
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- YTD
- 17.67%
- 1Y
- 36.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
AGM
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- 22.13%
BOKF vs. AGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOKF BOK Financial Corporation | 17.67% | 13.77% | 27.19% | -15.25% | 0.59% | 57.59% | -18.97% | 22.09% | -18.98% | 13.57% |
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 17.70% | -7.96% | 6.08% | 74.61% | -5.83% | 72.62% | -6.60% | 43.16% | -20.38% | 39.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOKF and AGM is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.36 |
The correlation between BOKF and AGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BOKF:
$8.39B
AGM:
$2.21B
BOKF:
$10.00
AGM:
$26.32
BOKF:
13.80
AGM:
7.70
BOKF:
12.24
AGM:
0.57
BOKF:
3.09
AGM:
1.20
BOKF:
$2.74B
AGM:
$1.35B
BOKF:
$1.83B
AGM:
$295.93M
BOKF:
$806.38M
AGM:
$192.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOKF vs. AGM — Risk / Return Rank
BOKF
AGM
BOKF vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOKF | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 0.58 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.26 | 1.11 | +7.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOKF vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOKF drawdown since its inception was -86.36%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOKF and AGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOKF | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.36% | -94.63% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -31.94% | +21.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.72% | -32.54% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.75% | -32.54% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.97% | -53.30% | -11.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -0.77% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -27.80% | +9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 16.56% | -12.11% |
Volatility
BOKF vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison
BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) at 5.27%. This indicates that BOKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOKF | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.27% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.96% | 25.69% | -10.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.35% | 30.58% | -7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 29.84% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.39% | 34.42% | -1.03% |
Dividends
BOKF vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison
BOKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than AGM's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 3.06% | 3.42% | 2.84% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% |
BOKF BOK Financial Corporation | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.53% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 2.59% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 2.81% |
Financials
BOKF vs. AGM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BOK Financial Corporation and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOKF vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison
BOKF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 208.83M and revenue of 211.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.
AGM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BOKF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 194.53M and revenue of 211.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.1%.
AGM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BOKF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BOK Financial Corporation reported a net income of 155.77M and revenue of 211.27M, resulting in a net margin of 73.7%.
AGM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 51.83M and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOKF and AGM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOKF has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to AGM (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOKF dropped -86.36% vs AGM's -94.63%.
BOKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOKF and AGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer