BOH vs. WFC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).

Performance

BOH vs. WFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOH vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOH Bank of Hawaii Corporation	9.58%	0.00%	3.64%	-1.51%	-4.11%	12.82%	-16.31%	45.86%	-19.19%	-0.36%
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	-14.16%	35.57%	46.48%	22.94%	-11.92%	61.15%	-41.65%	21.44%	-21.83%	13.21%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BOH : $2.97B WFC : $256.14B
EPS BOH : $5.15 WFC : $6.60
PE Ratio BOH : 14.41 WFC : 12.07
PS Ratio BOH : 2.74 WFC : 2.27
PB Ratio BOH : 1.78 WFC : 1.56
Total Revenue (TTM) BOH : $1.08B WFC : $113.26B
Gross Profit (TTM) BOH : $730.70M WFC : $81.08B
EBITDA (TTM) BOH : $312.73M WFC : $29.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOH achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than WFC's -14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, BOH has underperformed WFC with an annualized return of 4.61%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.

BOH

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: 9.58%
• 6M: 15.35%
• 1Y: 12.08%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: 4.61%

WFC

• 1D: 3.66%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: -14.16%
• 6M: -4.05%
• 1Y: 13.30%
• 3Y*: 32.00%
• 5Y*: 17.69%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BOH vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOH

BOH Risk / Return Rank: 56
BOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BOH Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BOH Martin Ratio Rank: 61

WFC

WFC Risk / Return Rank: 56
WFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WFC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WFC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOH vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOH	WFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.45	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.81	0.78	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.11	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	0.66	+0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.03	2.07	-0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOH vs. WFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOH Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the WFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOH and WFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOH	WFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.45	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.59	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.25	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.33	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between BOH and WFC is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOH vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison

BOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than WFC's 2.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOH Bank of Hawaii Corporation	3.77%	4.10%	4.91%	3.86%	3.61%	3.27%	3.50%	2.72%	3.48%	2.94%	2.13%	2.86%
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	2.20%	1.82%	2.14%	2.64%	2.66%	1.25%	4.04%	3.57%	3.56%	2.54%	2.75%	2.71%

Drawdowns

BOH vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOH drawdown since its inception was -62.62%, smaller than the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOH and WFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOH	WFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.62%	-79.01%	+16.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.03%	-22.75%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.12%	-37.10%	-25.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.62%	-64.46%	+1.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.44%	-17.00%	+10.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.33%	-15.34%	+3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.30%	7.28%	-0.98%

Volatility

BOH vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) is 5.57%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that BOH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOH	WFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	7.89%	-2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.21%	19.89%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.82%	29.40%	-2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.72%	30.17%	+3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.83%	32.16%	+0.67%

Financials

BOH vs. WFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BOH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of Hawaii Corporation reported a gross profit of 189.65M and revenue of 271.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.8%.

WFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 21.29B and revenue of 21.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BOH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of Hawaii Corporation reported an operating income of 77.63M and revenue of 271.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.

WFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 6.53B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

BOH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of Hawaii Corporation reported a net income of 60.94M and revenue of 271.57M, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.

WFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.36B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.