BOH vs. WFC
BOH (Bank of Hawaii Corporation) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BOH in Banks - Regional, WFC in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, BOH returned 4.22%/yr vs 7.54%/yr for WFC. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOH vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOH achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than WFC's -14.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BOH has underperformed WFC with an annualized return of 4.22%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.54% annualized return.
BOH
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 4.22%
WFC
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -14.68%
- 6M
- -11.00%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 27.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
BOH vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOH Bank of Hawaii Corporation | 10.49% | 0.00% | 3.64% | -1.51% | -4.11% | 12.82% | -16.31% | 45.86% | -19.19% | -0.36% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -14.68% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOH and WFC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 1984 | 0.48 |
The correlation between BOH and WFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BOH:
$2.97B
WFC:
$253.15B
BOH:
$5.49
WFC:
$6.73
BOH:
13.52
WFC:
11.69
BOH:
2.72
WFC:
2.02
BOH:
1.96
WFC:
1.55
BOH:
$1.09B
WFC:
$125.70B
BOH:
$756.40M
WFC:
$81.14B
BOH:
$323.51M
WFC:
$31.58B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOH vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank
BOH
WFC
BOH vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOH | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.06 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 0.27 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 0.63 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOH | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.24 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.45 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.23 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.33 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
BOH vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOH drawdown since its inception was -62.62%, smaller than the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOH and WFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOH | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.62% | -79.01% | +16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.03% | -23.02% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.23% | -24.73% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.82% | -37.10% | -24.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.62% | -64.46% | +1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -17.50% | +10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -15.35% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 9.93% | -4.12% |
Volatility
BOH vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) is 6.91%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that BOH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOH | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 7.87% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.61% | 19.96% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 26.53% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.68% | 30.21% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 32.27% | +0.58% |
Dividends
BOH vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
BOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than WFC's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOH Bank of Hawaii Corporation | 3.77% | 4.10% | 4.91% | 3.86% | 3.61% | 3.27% | 3.50% | 2.72% | 3.48% | 2.94% | 2.13% | 2.86% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
BOH vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOH vs. WFC - Profitability Comparison
BOH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of Hawaii Corporation reported a gross profit of 190.57M and revenue of 263.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.3%.
WFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 20.31B and revenue of 31.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
BOH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of Hawaii Corporation reported an operating income of 74.50M and revenue of 263.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.3%.
WFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 5.85B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
BOH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of Hawaii Corporation reported a net income of 57.43M and revenue of 263.54M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
WFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.29B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOH and WFC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFC has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to BOH (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOH dropped -62.62% vs WFC's -79.01%.
BOH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOH and WFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer