BNZI vs. DECK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BNZI (Banzai International Inc) and DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) are both stocks. BNZI operates in Software - Application (Technology), while DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, BNZI returned -87.36%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for DECK. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BNZI vs. DECK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banzai International Inc (BNZI) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNZI achieves a -83.69% return, which is significantly lower than DECK's 3.56% return.

BNZI

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: -52.99%
• YTD: -83.69%
• 6M: -88.50%
• 1Y: -98.35%
• 3Y*: -96.89%
• 5Y*: -87.36%
• 10Y*: —

DECK

• 1D: -3.10%
• 1M: 9.94%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: 13.05%
• 1Y: 1.45%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 14.73%
• 10Y*: 28.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNZI vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNZI Banzai International Inc	-83.69%	-93.69%	-98.37%	-81.42%	3.69%	-3.84%
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation	3.56%	-48.95%	82.30%	67.46%	8.97%	13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BNZI and DECK is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021	0.06

Fundamentals

EPS BNZI : -$13.31 DECK : $6.98
PS Ratio BNZI : 0.55 DECK : 2.88
Total Revenue (TTM) BNZI : $10.79M DECK : $5.47B
Gross Profit (TTM) BNZI : $8.19M DECK : $3.16B
EBITDA (TTM) BNZI : -$21.44M DECK : $1.31B

Return for Risk

BNZI vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNZI

BNZI Risk / Return Rank: 6
BNZI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BNZI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BNZI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BNZI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BNZI Martin Ratio Rank: 13

DECK

DECK Risk / Return Rank: 40
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNZI vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banzai International Inc (BNZI) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNZI	DECK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	0.03	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.59	0.39	-2.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.72	1.05	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	0.04	-1.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	0.09	-1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNZI vs. DECK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNZI Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the DECK Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNZI and DECK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNZI	DECK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	0.03	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.68	0.34	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.69	0.24	-0.93

Drawdowns

BNZI vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNZI drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than DECK's maximum drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNZI and DECK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNZI	DECK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-94.36%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.40%	-35.81%	-62.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-100.00%	-64.35%	-35.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-100.00%	-64.35%	-35.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-51.88%	-48.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.49%	-40.35%	-7.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.56%	16.89%	+62.67%

Volatility

BNZI vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison

Banzai International Inc (BNZI) has a higher volatility of 88.19% compared to Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) at 12.52%. This indicates that BNZI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNZI	DECK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	88.19%	12.52%	+75.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	125.82%	31.20%	+94.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	155.07%	45.35%	+109.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	129.30%	43.98%	+85.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.58%	42.46%	+83.12%

Dividends

BNZI vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNZI nor DECK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNZI and DECK in my portfolio?

BNZI and DECK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNZI or DECK?

BNZI has higher volatility (88.19%) compared to DECK (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNZI dropped -100.00% vs DECK's -94.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DECK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.