BNO vs. DBA

In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a -9.72% return, which is significantly lower than DBA's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BNO has underperformed DBA with an annualized return of 1.19%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively higher 2.94% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BNO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BNO Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the DBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNO and DBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.

The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than DBA's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and DBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 4.01%. This indicates that BNO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.