BNO vs. DBA
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA).
BNO and DBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNO is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. It was launched on Jun 2, 2010. DBA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007. Both BNO and DBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BNO or DBA.
Key characteristics
| BNO | DBA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.07% | 15.04% |
| 1Y Return | 23.13% | 19.16% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 20.94% | 10.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.35% | 9.88% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -3.50% | -0.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.85 | 1.13 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.86% | 16.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.06% | -67.97% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.52% | -38.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNO and DBA is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BNO vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly lower than DBA's 15.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BNO has underperformed DBA with an annualized return of -3.50%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively higher -0.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BNO vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BNO vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BNO vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 4.03% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
BNO vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than DBA's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and DBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BNO vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) is 5.45%, while Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) has a volatility of 9.81%. This indicates that BNO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.