BNL vs. GOOD
Compare and contrast key facts about Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BNL or GOOD.
Key characteristics
| BNL | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -13.47% | 5.60% |
| 1Y Return | -2.06% | 26.62% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.64% | -6.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.11 | 0.99 |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.84% | 26.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.56% | -67.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -37.97% | -36.16% |
Fundamentals
| BNL | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.74B | $548.02M |
| EPS | $0.83 | -$0.19 |
| PE Ratio | 17.27 | 2.76 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442.89M | $147.58M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $385.74M | $115.82M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $375.04M | $101.30M |
Correlation
The correlation between BNL and GOOD is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BNL vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BNL achieves a -13.47% return, which is significantly lower than GOOD's 5.60% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BNL vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BNL vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison
BNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, less than GOOD's 8.53% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNL Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. | 7.73% | 6.50% | 6.66% | 4.13% | 7.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 8.53% | 8.57% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% | 8.74% | 8.35% |
Drawdowns
BNL vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNL drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum GOOD drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNL and GOOD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BNL vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BNL vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities