PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDC vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDC vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDC achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.70% return.


BNDC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.17%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*

FBND

1D
0.09%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.67%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
2.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDC vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
0.17%7.29%0.86%5.36%-13.54%-2.01%8.66%9.57%-1.49%3.97%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.70%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDC and FBND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2016

0.81

The correlation between BNDC and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.97 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNDC vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BNDC
FBND

Financial Services

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

71.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

27.5%

Financial Services

BNDC
100.0%
FBND
0.2%

Basic Materials

BNDC

-

FBND

-

Communication Services

BNDC

-

FBND

-

Consumer Cyclical

BNDC

-

FBND

-

Consumer Defensive

BNDC

-

FBND

-

Energy

BNDC

-

FBND
1.1%

Healthcare

BNDC

-

FBND

-

Industrials

BNDC

-

FBND
71.4%

Real Estate

BNDC

-

FBND

-

Technology

BNDC

-

FBND

-

Utilities

BNDC

-

FBND
27.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDC vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDC
BNDC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDC vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDCFBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.50

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

2.23

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.06

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.88

6.28

-1.40

BNDC vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDC and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDCFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.50

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.16

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.45

-0.24

Drawdowns

BNDC vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDC drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDC and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDCFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-17.25%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-2.66%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.30%

-5.94%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.60%

-17.25%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-1.23%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-3.35%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.88%

+0.08%

Volatility

BNDC vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDCFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.28%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.76%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

3.86%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

5.92%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.06%

6.10%

+1.96%

BNDC vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDC vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than FBND's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
4.14%4.16%3.81%3.19%2.64%1.72%2.61%2.89%2.86%2.50%0.64%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.69%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BNDC and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBND has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to BNDC (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDC dropped -18.80% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 5-year performance, FBND leads with 0.94% vs -0.11% for BNDC. On fees, BNDC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FBND has performed better with a 0.94% return vs -0.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 4.14% for BNDC.

BNDC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNDC and 0.36% for FBND.

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDC and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer