PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDC vs. FALN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNDC vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNDC vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
0.10%7.29%0.86%5.36%-13.54%-2.01%8.66%9.57%-1.49%3.97%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
-1.06%8.92%7.68%13.47%-13.79%5.40%14.85%17.42%-4.97%8.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDC achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's -1.06% return.


BNDC

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*

FALN

1D
1.04%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNDC vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNDC vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDC
BNDC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDC vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDCFALNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

0.92

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.31

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.15

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.10

4.96

+0.14

BNDC vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDC and FALN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDCFALNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.92

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.50

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.72

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between BNDC and FALN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BNDC vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than FALN's 6.51% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
4.27%4.16%3.81%3.19%2.64%1.72%2.61%2.89%2.86%2.50%0.64%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.51%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%

Drawdowns

BNDC vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDC drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDC and FALN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDCFALNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-29.22%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-5.57%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.60%

-18.78%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-2.83%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-3.37%

-4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.29%

-0.37%

Volatility

BNDC vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) is 1.53%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that BNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNDCFALNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

2.77%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

3.53%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62%

6.90%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

7.28%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.11%

9.01%

-0.90%