BN vs. LADR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Corp (BN) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR).

Performance

BN vs. LADR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Corp (BN) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BN vs. LADR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BN Brookfield Corp	-11.65%	20.54%	44.18%	28.60%	-34.80%	49.30%	8.99%	52.68%	-10.65%	33.82%
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	-8.98%	6.69%	5.53%	25.22%	-8.95%	31.28%	-40.80%	26.36%	24.54%	8.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BN : $95.79B LADR : $1.23B
EPS BN : $0.55 LADR : $0.38
PE Ratio BN : 73.13 LADR : 25.51
PS Ratio BN : 1.26 LADR : 3.18
PB Ratio BN : 2.19 LADR : 0.83
Total Revenue (TTM) BN : $76.13B LADR : $387.43M
Gross Profit (TTM) BN : $29.53B LADR : $310.84M
EBITDA (TTM) BN : $32.77B LADR : $271.56M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BN achieves a -11.65% return, which is significantly lower than LADR's -8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BN has outperformed LADR with an annualized return of 13.94%, while LADR has yielded a comparatively lower 6.66% annualized return.

BN

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: -11.65%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

LADR

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -3.53%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -6.40%
• 1Y: -6.67%
• 3Y*: 9.98%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 6.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BN vs. LADR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BN

BN Risk / Return Rank: 59
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

LADR

LADR Risk / Return Rank: 26
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BN vs. LADR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corp (BN) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BN	LADR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	-0.33	+0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	-0.31	+1.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.96	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	-0.36	+1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.40	-0.79	+3.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BN vs. LADR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BN Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the LADR Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BN and LADR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BN	LADR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	-0.33	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.18	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.14	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.09	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BN and LADR is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BN vs. LADR - Dividend Comparison

BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than LADR's 9.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BN Brookfield Corp	0.62%	0.52%	0.56%	0.70%	1.44%	1.12%	1.55%	1.11%	1.56%	1.29%	1.58%	1.50%
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	9.42%	8.37%	8.22%	7.99%	8.76%	6.67%	9.61%	7.54%	9.92%	8.91%	9.37%	17.91%

Drawdowns

BN vs. LADR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BN drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, roughly equal to the maximum LADR drawdown of -81.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN and LADR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BN	LADR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.22%	-81.63%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.05%	-14.68%	-7.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.85%	-26.97%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.42%	-81.63%	+30.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.55%	-13.15%	-4.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.61%	-18.44%	-10.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.40%	6.78%	+0.62%

Volatility

BN vs. LADR - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Corp (BN) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) at 5.39%. This indicates that BN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LADR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BN	LADR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	5.39%	+4.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.50%	14.14%	+7.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.43%	20.46%	+12.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.94%	25.01%	+5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.06%	48.28%	-18.22%

Financials

BN vs. LADR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Corp and Ladder Capital Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a gross profit of 8.91B and revenue of 21.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.

LADR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a gross profit of 76.96M and revenue of 96.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.

BN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported an operating income of 8.89B and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.9%.

LADR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported an operating income of 61.24M and revenue of 96.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.7%.

BN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a net income of 743.00M and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

LADR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a net income of 29.00K and revenue of 96.18M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.