BMY vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BMY or VONG.
Correlation
The correlation between BMY and VONG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BMY vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BMY:
0.61
VONG:
0.21
BMY:
1.14
VONG:
0.40
BMY:
1.14
VONG:
1.05
BMY:
0.38
VONG:
0.25
BMY:
1.78
VONG:
0.84
BMY:
10.15%
VONG:
5.05%
BMY:
29.75%
VONG:
20.12%
BMY:
-70.62%
VONG:
-32.72%
BMY:
-19.19%
VONG:
-17.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMY achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BMY has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 2.55%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.51% annualized return.
BMY
6.54%
-0.45%
13.34%
18.65%
5.00%
2.55%
VONG
-13.65%
-9.36%
-6.37%
3.98%
20.05%
14.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BMY vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BMY
VONG
BMY vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BMY vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than VONG's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4.06% | 4.24% | 4.44% | 3.00% | 2.36% | 3.69% | 2.55% | 3.08% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 2.17% | 2.46% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.62% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
BMY vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMY drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMY and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BMY vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is 7.85%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that BMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.