PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BMY.L vs. LOTBY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BMY.LLOTBY
YTD Return51.30%122.56%
1Y Return71.76%122.56%
3Y Return (Ann)29.10%32.01%
Sharpe Ratio2.131.98
Sortino Ratio2.97279.19
Omega Ratio1.36211.11
Calmar Ratio5.3119.02
Martin Ratio13.25795.85
Ulcer Index5.38%0.15%
Daily Std Dev33.32%61.84%
Max Drawdown-72.41%-12.85%
Current Drawdown-7.17%0.00%

Fundamentals


BMY.LLOTBY
Market Cap£566.81M$11.68B
EPS£0.46$1.87
PE Ratio15.1376.86
Total Revenue (TTM)£385.77M$1.16B
Gross Profit (TTM)£215.09M$334.16M
EBITDA (TTM)£61.94M$226.81M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

The correlation between BMY.L and LOTBY is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

BMY.L vs. LOTBY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BMY.L achieves a 51.30% return, which is significantly lower than LOTBY's 122.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.30%
49.13%
BMY.L
LOTBY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BMY.L vs. LOTBY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) and Lotus Bakeries NV (LOTBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 5.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 14.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.21
LOTBY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LOTBY, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LOTBY, currently valued at 279.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00279.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LOTBY, currently valued at 211.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00211.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LOTBY, currently valued at 19.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.0019.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LOTBY, currently valued at 795.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00795.85

BMY.L vs. LOTBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the LOTBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMY.L and LOTBY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.15
1.98
BMY.L
LOTBY

Dividends

BMY.L vs. LOTBY - Dividend Comparison

BMY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than LOTBY's 0.44% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BMY.L
Bloomsbury Publishing plc
2.14%2.99%2.40%5.19%2.78%2.86%3.87%3.68%3.91%4.21%3.73%3.14%
LOTBY
Lotus Bakeries NV
0.44%1.49%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BMY.L vs. LOTBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMY.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, which is greater than LOTBY's maximum drawdown of -12.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMY.L and LOTBY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.70%
0
BMY.L
LOTBY

Volatility

BMY.L vs. LOTBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) is 14.01%, while Lotus Bakeries NV (LOTBY) has a volatility of 30.45%. This indicates that BMY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOTBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.01%
30.45%
BMY.L
LOTBY

Financials

BMY.L vs. LOTBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomsbury Publishing plc and Lotus Bakeries NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. BMY.L values in GBp, LOTBY values in USD