PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMY.L vs. DTEGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) and Deutsche Telekom AG ADR (DTEGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BMY.L is traded in GBp, while DTEGY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DTEGY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMY.L achieves a 39.42% return, which is significantly higher than DTEGY's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BMY.L has outperformed DTEGY with an annualized return of 19.76%, while DTEGY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.


BMY.L

1D
2.75%
1M
12.37%
YTD
39.42%
6M
34.53%
1Y
32.30%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
19.76%

DTEGY

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.25%
YTD
2.45%
6M
3.81%
1Y
-12.43%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMY.L
Bloomsbury Publishing plc
39.42%-26.22%46.52%8.05%28.21%28.66%8.68%48.43%10.55%15.83%
DTEGY
Deutsche Telekom AG ADR
2.45%4.51%30.29%18.18%30.51%4.74%16.97%-3.45%6.78%-2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BMY.L and DTEGY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2010

0.07

The correlation between BMY.L and DTEGY shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BMY.L:

£548.23M

DTEGY:

$156.11B

EPS

BMY.L:

£0.64

DTEGY:

$1.82

PE Ratio

BMY.L:

10.48

DTEGY:

17.77

PEG Ratio

BMY.L:

0.67

DTEGY:

0.74

PS Ratio

BMY.L:

0.80

DTEGY:

1.31

PB Ratio

BMY.L:

2.54

DTEGY:

2.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

BMY.L:

£686.90M

DTEGY:

$119.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BMY.L:

£378.10M

DTEGY:

$45.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

BMY.L:

£100.50M

DTEGY:

$49.13B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMY.L vs. DTEGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMY.L
BMY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BMY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DTEGY
DTEGY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DTEGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTEGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTEGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DTEGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTEGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) and Deutsche Telekom AG ADR (DTEGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMY.LDTEGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.92

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

-0.62

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

-1.04

+5.91

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the DTEGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMY.L and DTEGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMY.LDTEGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

-0.53

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.74

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.53

-0.08

Drawdowns

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMY.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, which is greater than DTEGY's maximum drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMY.L and DTEGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMY.LDTEGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.41%

-37.12%

-35.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.79%

-20.00%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.66%

-20.00%

-19.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.66%

-22.56%

-17.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.66%

-37.12%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-16.77%

+9.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-9.22%

-21.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

11.92%

-5.30%

Volatility

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Volatility Comparison

Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) and Deutsche Telekom AG ADR (DTEGY) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMY.LDTEGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

6.57%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.97%

18.31%

+5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.65%

23.58%

+8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.21%

19.91%

+16.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.80%

20.82%

+15.98%

Dividends

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Dividend Comparison

BMY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than DTEGY's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMY.L
Bloomsbury Publishing plc
2.32%3.24%2.21%2.99%2.40%5.19%2.85%2.77%3.75%3.57%3.79%4.08%
DTEGY
Deutsche Telekom AG ADR
3.59%2.98%2.70%3.09%7.01%2.67%5.88%4.71%4.52%3.70%6.92%3.19%

Financials

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomsbury Publishing plc and Deutsche Telekom AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
166.40M
30.36B
(BMY.L) Total Revenue
(DTEGY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BMY.L values in GBp, DTEGY values in USD

BMY.L vs. DTEGY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloomsbury Publishing plc and Deutsche Telekom AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
54.6%
23.4%
Portfolio components
BMY.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloomsbury Publishing plc reported a gross profit of 90.90M and revenue of 166.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

DTEGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Telekom AG ADR reported a gross profit of 7.10B and revenue of 30.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

BMY.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloomsbury Publishing plc reported an operating income of 16.90M and revenue of 166.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

DTEGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Telekom AG ADR reported an operating income of 6.62B and revenue of 30.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

BMY.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloomsbury Publishing plc reported a net income of 13.20M and revenue of 166.40M, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

DTEGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Telekom AG ADR reported a net income of 2.08B and revenue of 30.36B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMY.L and DTEGY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMY.L and DTEGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer