PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BMY.L vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BMY.LASML
YTD Return51.30%-10.88%
1Y Return71.76%3.05%
3Y Return (Ann)29.10%-6.80%
5Y Return (Ann)27.02%21.09%
10Y Return (Ann)20.22%21.94%
Sharpe Ratio2.130.04
Sortino Ratio2.970.36
Omega Ratio1.361.05
Calmar Ratio5.310.05
Martin Ratio13.250.12
Ulcer Index5.38%16.45%
Daily Std Dev33.32%44.68%
Max Drawdown-72.41%-90.00%
Current Drawdown-7.17%-38.85%

Fundamentals


BMY.LASML
Market Cap£566.81M$264.27B
EPS£0.46$18.74
PE Ratio15.1335.71
PEG Ratio0.001.68
Total Revenue (TTM)£385.77M$26.24B
Gross Profit (TTM)£215.09M$13.42B
EBITDA (TTM)£61.94M$9.14B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between BMY.L and ASML is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BMY.L vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BMY.L achieves a 51.30% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's -10.88% return. Over the past 10 years, BMY.L has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 20.22%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.30%
-26.56%
BMY.L
ASML

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BMY.L vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 5.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 14.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.21
ASML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASML, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASML, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASML, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASML, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.17

BMY.L vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMY.L and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.15
-0.06
BMY.L
ASML

Dividends

BMY.L vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

BMY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than ASML's 1.00% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BMY.L
Bloomsbury Publishing plc
2.14%2.99%2.40%5.19%2.78%2.86%3.87%3.68%3.91%4.21%3.73%3.14%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
1.00%0.85%1.27%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.77%0.75%

Drawdowns

BMY.L vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMY.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMY.L and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.70%
-38.85%
BMY.L
ASML

Volatility

BMY.L vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) is 14.01%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 20.12%. This indicates that BMY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.01%
20.12%
BMY.L
ASML

Financials

BMY.L vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomsbury Publishing plc and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. BMY.L values in GBp, ASML values in USD