PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BME vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BME vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BME achieves a -1.24% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, BME has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 7.66%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.


BME

1D
-1.68%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-1.24%
6M
0.32%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
7.66%

VHT

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-4.81%
6M
-4.41%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BME vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BME
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust
-1.24%17.87%-0.08%-1.08%-4.62%7.25%18.64%24.04%6.38%23.10%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.81%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BME and VHT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2005

0.57

Over the past year, BME and VHT have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BME vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BME
BME Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BME Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BME Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BME vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMEVHTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

0.96

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

1.51

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.34

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.32

3.39

+1.92

BME vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BME Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BME and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMEVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.96

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.30

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.54

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.56

-0.04

Drawdowns

BME vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BME drawdown since its inception was -42.03%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BME and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMEVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.03%

-39.12%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-10.40%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-16.91%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.26%

-17.71%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.65%

-28.85%

-7.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-7.83%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-5.99%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

4.12%

-0.59%

Volatility

BME vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) have volatilities of 3.86% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMEVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

4.00%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

10.14%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

14.32%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

14.96%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

16.94%

+2.95%

Dividends

BME vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

BME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than VHT's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BME
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust
8.00%7.65%6.87%6.32%5.87%5.03%5.04%5.65%6.58%6.58%9.45%17.04%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.72%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BME and VHT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHT has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to BME (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BME dropped -42.03% vs VHT's -39.12%.

BME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BME and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer