PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BLX.TONOA.TO
YTD Return-0.50%4.38%
1Y Return17.12%7.25%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.79%15.21%
5Y Return (Ann)9.35%15.80%
10Y Return (Ann)12.57%18.92%
Sharpe Ratio0.670.22
Sortino Ratio1.210.54
Omega Ratio1.141.07
Calmar Ratio0.380.23
Martin Ratio1.860.41
Ulcer Index10.09%17.44%
Daily Std Dev27.99%33.19%
Max Drawdown-73.68%-92.20%
Current Drawdown-36.31%-16.00%

Fundamentals


BLX.TONOA.TO
Market CapCA$3.39BCA$766.45M
EPSCA$0.93CA$1.90
PE Ratio35.4615.04
PEG Ratio2.223.71
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$781.00MCA$1.19B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$346.00MCA$233.51M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$488.00MCA$250.08M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between BLX.TO and NOA.TO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BLX.TO achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than NOA.TO's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BLX.TO has underperformed NOA.TO with an annualized return of 12.57%, while NOA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.69%
0.19%
BLX.TO
NOA.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boralex Inc. (BLX.TO) and North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLX.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLX.TO, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLX.TO, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BLX.TO, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLX.TO, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BLX.TO, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.65
NOA.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NOA.TO, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NOA.TO, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NOA.TO, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NOA.TO, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NOA.TO, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.34

BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the NOA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLX.TO and NOA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.59
0.18
BLX.TO
NOA.TO

Dividends

BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO - Dividend Comparison

BLX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than NOA.TO's 1.40% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BLX.TO
Boralex Inc.
2.06%2.02%1.70%1.96%1.44%2.72%3.74%2.55%2.87%3.60%4.05%
NOA.TO
North American Construction Group Ltd.
1.40%1.45%1.77%0.83%1.29%0.76%0.66%1.27%1.54%3.24%2.17%

Drawdowns

BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLX.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.68%, smaller than the maximum NOA.TO drawdown of -92.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLX.TO and NOA.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-41.86%
-18.47%
BLX.TO
NOA.TO

Volatility

BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boralex Inc. (BLX.TO) is 9.37%, while North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA.TO) has a volatility of 17.45%. This indicates that BLX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.37%
17.45%
BLX.TO
NOA.TO

Financials

BLX.TO vs. NOA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boralex Inc. and North American Construction Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items