BLV vs. JEPI
BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BLV is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLV returned -3.33%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for JEPI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.
Performance
BLV vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLV achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 0.15% return.
BLV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.33%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
JEPI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
BLV vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 0.28% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 4.80% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.15% | 8.09% | 12.57% | 9.83% | -3.49% | 21.52% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLV and JEPI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between BLV and JEPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BLV vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLV
JEPI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BLV
JEPI
Basic Materials
BLV
-
JEPI
Communication Services
BLV
-
JEPI
Consumer Cyclical
BLV
-
JEPI
Consumer Defensive
BLV
-
JEPI
Energy
BLV
-
JEPI
Healthcare
BLV
-
JEPI
Industrials
BLV
-
JEPI
Real Estate
BLV
-
JEPI
Technology
BLV
-
JEPI
Utilities
BLV
-
JEPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLV vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank
BLV
JEPI
BLV vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLV | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 3.73 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLV | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.99 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.66 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.01 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
BLV vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLV and JEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLV | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -13.71% | -24.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.73% | -6.68% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -13.26% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -13.71% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.14% | -4.83% | -19.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.51% | -2.12% | -7.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.07% | +0.19% |
Volatility
BLV vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 1.35%. This indicates that BLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLV | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 1.35% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.62% | 6.07% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.15% | 7.85% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 11.06% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 10.80% | +1.18% |
BLV vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLV vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison
BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than JEPI's 8.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.80% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.27% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 8.40% | 11.68% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLV and JEPI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLV has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to JEPI (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLV dropped -38.29% vs JEPI's -13.71%.
On 5-year performance, JEPI leads with 7.26% vs -3.33% for BLV. On fees, BLV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JEPI has performed better with a 7.26% return vs -3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPI.
JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 4.80% for BLV.
BLV is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BLV and 0.35% for JEPI.
JEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLV and JEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer