PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BLU.L vs. NFLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BLU.L and NFLY is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

BLU.L vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Star Capital plc (BLU.L) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
124.88%
46.15%
BLU.L
NFLY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLU.L:

-0.16

NFLY:

3.10

Sortino Ratio

BLU.L:

1.53

NFLY:

3.96

Omega Ratio

BLU.L:

1.30

NFLY:

1.58

Calmar Ratio

BLU.L:

-0.44

NFLY:

7.27

Martin Ratio

BLU.L:

-0.63

NFLY:

22.40

Ulcer Index

BLU.L:

67.58%

NFLY:

3.23%

Daily Std Dev

BLU.L:

260.19%

NFLY:

23.20%

Max Drawdown

BLU.L:

-97.71%

NFLY:

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

BLU.L:

-91.51%

NFLY:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLU.L achieves a 164.29% return, which is significantly higher than NFLY's 13.88% return.


BLU.L

YTD

164.29%

1M

37.04%

6M

131.25%

1Y

-46.22%

5Y*

-17.68%

10Y*

N/A

NFLY

YTD

13.88%

1M

18.60%

6M

46.15%

1Y

66.82%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLU.L vs. NFLY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLU.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLU.L is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLU.L is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLU.L is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLU.L is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLU.L is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLU.L is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NFLY is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLU.L vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Star Capital plc (BLU.L) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLU.L, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.172.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLU.L, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.523.72
The chart of Omega ratio for BLU.L, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.281.55
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLU.L, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.486.61
The chart of Martin ratio for BLU.L, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.6420.12
BLU.L
NFLY

The current BLU.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the NFLY Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLU.L and NFLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.17
2.88
BLU.L
NFLY

Dividends

BLU.L vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison

BLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.83%.


TTM20242023
BLU.L
Blue Star Capital plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
45.83%49.91%11.84%

Drawdowns

BLU.L vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLU.L drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLU.L and NFLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-64.80%
0
BLU.L
NFLY

Volatility

BLU.L vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison

Blue Star Capital plc (BLU.L) has a higher volatility of 47.10% compared to YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) at 6.61%. This indicates that BLU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
47.10%
6.61%
BLU.L
NFLY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab