BLMN vs. FSELX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLMN (Bloomin' Brands, Inc.) is a stock, while FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) is Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, BLMN returned -6.97%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for FSELX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BLMN vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLMN achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 85.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of -6.97%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.21% annualized return.

BLMN

• 1D: -4.10%
• 1M: 33.04%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 1.32%
• 3Y*: -30.66%
• 5Y*: -20.58%
• 10Y*: -6.97%

FSELX

• 1D: 6.35%
• 1M: 26.53%
• YTD: 85.56%
• 6M: 83.27%
• 1Y: 166.37%
• 3Y*: 68.85%
• 5Y*: 46.95%
• 10Y*: 39.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLMN vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.	21.39%	-46.60%	-54.39%	45.53%	-1.65%	8.03%	-11.09%	25.84%	-14.75%	20.45%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	85.56%	52.17%	49.68%	78.49%	-35.27%	59.16%	44.33%	64.50%	-12.01%	34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BLMN and FSELX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2012	0.29

The correlation between BLMN and FSELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BLMN vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLMN

BLMN Risk / Return Rank: 43
BLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FSELX

FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLMN vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	5.35	-5.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	5.23	-4.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.71	-0.63
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	12.18	-12.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.04	46.77	-46.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLMN vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLMN and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	5.35	-5.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37	1.21	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.13	1.12	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.55	-0.58

Drawdowns

BLMN vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.50%, roughly equal to the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and FSELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.50%	-82.54%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.03%	-14.38%	-34.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-80.50%	-36.31%	-44.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.50%	-46.37%	-34.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.50%	-46.37%	-34.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.23%	0.00%	-72.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.92%	-28.70%	+0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.73%	3.74%	+27.99%

Volatility

BLMN vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) has a higher volatility of 36.68% compared to Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) at 12.01%. This indicates that BLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.68%	12.01%	+24.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.22%	25.42%	+27.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.51%	32.74%	+46.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.60%	38.97%	+16.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.10%	35.07%	+19.03%

Dividends

BLMN vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than FSELX's 8.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.	2.00%	7.29%	7.86%	3.41%	2.78%	0.00%	1.03%	1.81%	2.01%	1.50%	1.55%	1.42%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	8.83%	11.11%	7.97%	7.20%	6.69%	6.99%	8.13%	3.36%	26.80%	14.44%	3.82%	15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLMN and FSELX in my portfolio?

BLMN and FSELX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLMN or FSELX?

BLMN has higher volatility (36.68%) compared to FSELX (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLMN dropped -80.50% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.