BLMN vs. FSELX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX).

FSELX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985.

Performance

BLMN vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BLMN vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.	-12.48%	-46.60%	-54.39%	45.53%	-1.65%	8.03%	-11.09%	25.84%	-14.75%	20.45%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	0.00%	52.17%	49.68%	78.49%	-35.27%	59.16%	44.33%	64.50%	-12.01%	34.51%

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of -8.73%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 31.42% annualized return.

BLMN

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -11.76%
• YTD: -12.48%
• 6M: -24.69%
• 1Y: -21.69%
• 3Y*: -37.76%
• 5Y*: -25.16%
• 10Y*: -8.73%

FSELX

• 1D: -4.27%
• 1M: -9.75%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 85.27%
• 3Y*: 43.05%
• 5Y*: 30.67%
• 10Y*: 31.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BLMN vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLMN

BLMN Risk / Return Rank: 29
BLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FSELX

FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLMN vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	2.07	-2.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	2.72	-2.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.38	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	4.58	-5.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	18.71	-19.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLMN vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLMN and FSELX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	2.07	-2.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.48	0.80	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.17	0.91	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.49	-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between BLMN and FSELX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BLMN vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, less than FSELX's 11.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.	5.56%	7.29%	7.86%	3.41%	2.78%	0.00%	1.03%	1.81%	2.01%	1.50%	1.55%	1.42%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	11.11%	11.11%	7.97%	7.20%	6.69%	6.99%	8.13%	3.36%	26.80%	14.44%	3.82%	15.22%

Drawdowns

BLMN vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.50%, roughly equal to the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and FSELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.50%	-82.54%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.03%	-17.23%	-31.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.50%	-46.37%	-34.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.50%	-46.37%	-34.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.98%	-14.38%	-65.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.33%	-28.82%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.71%	4.21%	+24.50%

Volatility

BLMN vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) at 10.47%. This indicates that BLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLMN	FSELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	10.47%	+4.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.87%	24.91%	+18.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.26%	40.89%	+33.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.25%	38.58%	+13.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.27%	34.71%	+17.56%