BLMN vs. COP
BLMN (Bloomin' Brands, Inc.) and COP (ConocoPhillips Company) are both stocks. BLMN operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while COP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BLMN returned -6.97%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for COP. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLMN vs. COP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLMN achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 29.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed COP with an annualized return of -6.97%, while COP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.
BLMN
- 1D
- -4.10%
- 1M
- 33.04%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- -30.66%
- 5Y*
- -20.58%
- 10Y*
- -6.97%
COP
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 29.12%
- 6M
- 31.65%
- 1Y
- 39.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
BLMN vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc. | 21.39% | -46.60% | -54.39% | 45.53% | -1.65% | 8.03% | -11.09% | 25.84% | -14.75% | 20.45% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 29.12% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLMN and COP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2012 | 0.21 |
The correlation between BLMN and COP shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BLMN:
$642.27M
COP:
$145.83B
BLMN:
$0.25
COP:
$5.90
BLMN:
29.39
COP:
20.18
BLMN:
1.92
COP:
1.17
BLMN:
0.16
COP:
2.53
BLMN:
1.62
COP:
2.26
BLMN:
$3.97B
COP:
$58.31B
BLMN:
$2.78B
COP:
$17.02B
BLMN:
$229.40M
COP:
$22.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLMN vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank
BLMN
COP
BLMN vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 1.37 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 1.92 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.22 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.69 | -2.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 6.13 | -6.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.37 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.58 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | 0.37 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.23 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
BLMN vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.50%, roughly equal to the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and COP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.50% | -84.55% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.03% | -14.90% | -34.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.50% | -36.19% | -44.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.50% | -36.19% | -44.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.50% | -70.66% | -9.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.23% | -10.36% | -61.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.92% | -25.49% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.73% | 6.53% | +25.20% |
Volatility
BLMN vs. COP - Volatility Comparison
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) has a higher volatility of 36.68% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 8.92%. This indicates that BLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.68% | 8.92% | +27.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.22% | 22.81% | +30.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.51% | 29.27% | +50.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.60% | 32.72% | +22.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.10% | 37.67% | +16.43% |
Dividends
BLMN vs. COP - Dividend Comparison
BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than COP's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc. | 2.00% | 7.29% | 7.86% | 3.41% | 2.78% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.55% | 1.42% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.77% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
Financials
BLMN vs. COP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLMN vs. COP - Profitability Comparison
BLMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 742.26M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.1%.
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
BLMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 64.64M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
BLMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 55.65M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLMN and COP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLMN has higher volatility (36.68%) compared to COP (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLMN dropped -80.50% vs COP's -84.55%.
COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLMN and COP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer