PortfoliosLab logo
BLMN vs. COP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLMN and COP is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BLMN vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-26.18%
135.34%
BLMN
COP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLMN:

-1.15

COP:

-0.81

Sortino Ratio

BLMN:

-2.24

COP:

-1.01

Omega Ratio

BLMN:

0.75

COP:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

BLMN:

-0.89

COP:

-0.72

Martin Ratio

BLMN:

-1.63

COP:

-1.73

Ulcer Index

BLMN:

42.23%

COP:

15.15%

Daily Std Dev

BLMN:

58.77%

COP:

32.30%

Max Drawdown

BLMN:

-80.33%

COP:

-70.66%

Current Drawdown

BLMN:

-73.86%

COP:

-31.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLMN:

$680.30M

COP:

$110.75B

EPS

BLMN:

-$0.61

COP:

$7.81

PEG Ratio

BLMN:

1.07

COP:

8.24

PS Ratio

BLMN:

0.17

COP:

2.05

PB Ratio

BLMN:

5.07

COP:

1.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLMN:

$3.13B

COP:

$41.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLMN:

$960.83M

COP:

$12.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLMN:

$188.79M

COP:

$18.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLMN achieves a -38.99% return, which is significantly lower than COP's -9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed COP with an annualized return of -8.43%, while COP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.42% annualized return.


BLMN

YTD

-38.99%

1M

17.09%

6M

-54.78%

1Y

-67.49%

5Y*

-5.70%

10Y*

-8.43%

COP

YTD

-9.71%

1M

7.45%

6M

-19.78%

1Y

-25.99%

5Y*

19.65%

10Y*

6.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLMN vs. COP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLMN is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLMN is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLMN is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLMN is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLMN is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLMN is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

COP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COP is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COP is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COP is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COP is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COP is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COP is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLMN vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLMN Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the COP Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLMN and COP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.15
-0.81
BLMN
COP

Dividends

BLMN vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.87%, more than COP's 3.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
11.87%7.86%3.41%2.78%0.00%1.03%1.81%2.01%1.50%1.55%1.42%0.00%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
3.06%2.54%3.37%4.20%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%

Drawdowns

BLMN vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.33%, which is greater than COP's maximum drawdown of -70.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and COP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-73.86%
-31.79%
BLMN
COP

Volatility

BLMN vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) has a higher volatility of 22.26% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 16.58%. This indicates that BLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
22.26%
16.58%
BLMN
COP

Financials

BLMN vs. COP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
972.02M
14.24B
(BLMN) Total Revenue
(COP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLMN vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
71.6%
29.4%
(BLMN) Gross Margin
(COP) Gross Margin
BLMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 695.78M and revenue of 972.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 4.19B and revenue of 14.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.4%.

BLMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -626.00K and revenue of 972.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 2.97B and revenue of 14.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

BLMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -79.46M and revenue of 972.02M, resulting in a net margin of -8.2%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.31B and revenue of 14.24B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.