BLMN vs. COP
Compare and contrast key facts about Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP).
Performance
BLMN vs. COP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLMN vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc. | -12.48% | -46.60% | -54.39% | 45.53% | -1.65% | 8.03% | -11.09% | 25.84% | -14.75% | 20.45% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 42.11% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
Fundamentals
BLMN:
$460.16M
COP:
$162.88B
BLMN:
$0.10
COP:
$6.39
BLMN:
55.82
COP:
20.64
BLMN:
3.57
COP:
1.20
BLMN:
0.12
COP:
2.76
BLMN:
$3.96B
COP:
$59.65B
BLMN:
$2.21B
COP:
$17.61B
BLMN:
$219.65M
COP:
$25.38B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLMN achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 42.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed COP with an annualized return of -8.73%, while COP has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.
BLMN
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -11.76%
- YTD
- -12.48%
- 6M
- -24.69%
- 1Y
- -21.69%
- 3Y*
- -37.76%
- 5Y*
- -25.16%
- 10Y*
- -8.73%
COP
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 16.34%
- YTD
- 42.11%
- 6M
- 41.94%
- 1Y
- 30.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 23.95%
- 10Y*
- 16.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLMN vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank
BLMN
COP
BLMN vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | 0.88 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.07 | 1.32 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.18 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.51 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 2.91 | -3.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 0.88 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | 0.74 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.43 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.23 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLMN and COP is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BLMN vs. COP - Dividend Comparison
BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than COP's 2.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc. | 5.56% | 7.29% | 7.86% | 3.41% | 2.78% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.55% | 1.42% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.45% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
Drawdowns
BLMN vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.50%, roughly equal to the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and COP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.50% | -84.55% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.03% | -22.09% | -26.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.50% | -36.19% | -44.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.50% | -70.66% | -9.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.98% | -1.35% | -78.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.33% | -25.55% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.71% | 11.45% | +17.26% |
Volatility
BLMN vs. COP - Volatility Comparison
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 6.82%. This indicates that BLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLMN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.66% | 6.82% | +7.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.87% | 20.55% | +23.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.26% | 34.39% | +39.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.25% | 32.78% | +19.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.27% | 37.68% | +14.59% |
Financials
BLMN vs. COP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLMN vs. COP - Profitability Comparison
BLMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 684.64M and revenue of 975.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 5.64B and revenue of 14.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.
BLMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -13.30M and revenue of 975.22M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 2.44B and revenue of 14.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.
BLMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -13.48M and revenue of 975.22M, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 14.19B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.