PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BLMN vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLMN and BABA is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

BLMN vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-19.55%
29.40%
BLMN
BABA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLMN:

-1.19

BABA:

0.88

Sortino Ratio

BLMN:

-1.93

BABA:

1.50

Omega Ratio

BLMN:

0.78

BABA:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

BLMN:

-0.86

BABA:

0.43

Martin Ratio

BLMN:

-1.33

BABA:

2.25

Ulcer Index

BLMN:

38.94%

BABA:

14.85%

Daily Std Dev

BLMN:

43.77%

BABA:

37.40%

Max Drawdown

BLMN:

-80.33%

BABA:

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

BLMN:

-57.27%

BABA:

-66.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLMN:

$1.06B

BABA:

$245.93B

EPS

BLMN:

-$0.08

BABA:

$4.82

PEG Ratio

BLMN:

1.07

BABA:

0.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLMN:

$3.35B

BABA:

$722.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLMN:

$419.79M

BABA:

$283.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLMN:

$153.43M

BABA:

$134.49B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLMN achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 22.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -4.80%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 1.95% annualized return.


BLMN

YTD

-0.25%

1M

3.05%

6M

-19.55%

1Y

-53.17%

5Y*

-7.46%

10Y*

-4.80%

BABA

YTD

22.08%

1M

23.68%

6M

29.40%

1Y

47.49%

5Y*

-13.38%

10Y*

1.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLMN vs. BABA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLMN is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLMN is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLMN is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLMN is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLMN is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLMN is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLMN vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLMN, currently valued at -1.19, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-1.190.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLMN, currently valued at -1.93, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.931.50
The chart of Omega ratio for BLMN, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.781.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLMN, currently valued at -0.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.860.43
The chart of Martin ratio for BLMN, currently valued at -1.33, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.332.25
BLMN
BABA

The current BLMN Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLMN and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.19
0.88
BLMN
BABA

Dividends

BLMN vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than BABA's 0.64% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
7.88%7.86%3.41%2.78%0.00%1.03%1.81%2.01%1.50%1.55%1.42%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.64%0.78%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BLMN vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-57.27%
-66.64%
BLMN
BABA

Volatility

BLMN vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) is 10.73%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 12.62%. This indicates that BLMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.73%
12.62%
BLMN
BABA

Financials

BLMN vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab