PortfoliosLab logo
BLMN vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLMN and BABA is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BLMN vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-49.13%
36.92%
BLMN
BABA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLMN:

-1.15

BABA:

1.35

Sortino Ratio

BLMN:

-2.24

BABA:

1.83

Omega Ratio

BLMN:

0.75

BABA:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

BLMN:

-0.89

BABA:

0.72

Martin Ratio

BLMN:

-1.63

BABA:

3.40

Ulcer Index

BLMN:

42.23%

BABA:

16.35%

Daily Std Dev

BLMN:

58.77%

BABA:

46.16%

Max Drawdown

BLMN:

-80.33%

BABA:

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

BLMN:

-73.86%

BABA:

-59.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLMN:

$680.30M

BABA:

$300.27B

EPS

BLMN:

-$0.61

BABA:

$6.85

PEG Ratio

BLMN:

1.07

BABA:

0.70

PS Ratio

BLMN:

0.17

BABA:

0.31

PB Ratio

BLMN:

5.07

BABA:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLMN:

$3.13B

BABA:

$759.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLMN:

$960.83M

BABA:

$307.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLMN:

$188.79M

BABA:

$149.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLMN achieves a -38.99% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 48.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -8.43%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.02% annualized return.


BLMN

YTD

-38.99%

1M

17.09%

6M

-54.78%

1Y

-67.49%

5Y*

-5.70%

10Y*

-8.43%

BABA

YTD

48.35%

1M

26.59%

6M

25.61%

1Y

61.69%

5Y*

-8.59%

10Y*

4.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLMN vs. BABA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLMN is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLMN is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLMN is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLMN is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLMN is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLMN is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLMN vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLMN Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLMN and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.15
1.35
BLMN
BABA

Dividends

BLMN vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.87%, more than BABA's 0.52% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
11.87%7.86%3.41%2.78%0.00%1.03%1.81%2.01%1.50%1.55%1.42%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.52%0.78%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BLMN vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-73.86%
-59.46%
BLMN
BABA

Volatility

BLMN vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) has a higher volatility of 22.26% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 12.59%. This indicates that BLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
22.26%
12.59%
BLMN
BABA

Financials

BLMN vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
972.02M
280.15B
(BLMN) Total Revenue
(BABA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLMN vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
71.6%
42.0%
(BLMN) Gross Margin
(BABA) Gross Margin
BLMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 695.78M and revenue of 972.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.

BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 117.63B and revenue of 280.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

BLMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -626.00K and revenue of 972.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 41.21B and revenue of 280.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

BLMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -79.46M and revenue of 972.02M, resulting in a net margin of -8.2%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 49.13B and revenue of 280.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.