PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLMN vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

BLMN vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BLMN vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
-12.48%-46.60%-54.39%45.53%-1.65%8.03%-11.09%25.84%-14.75%20.45%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-14.41%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLMN:

$460.16M

BABA:

$302.83B

EPS

BLMN:

$0.10

BABA:

$37.64

PE Ratio

BLMN:

55.82

BABA:

3.33

PEG Ratio

BLMN:

3.57

BABA:

0.26

PS Ratio

BLMN:

0.12

BABA:

0.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLMN:

$3.96B

BABA:

$1.01T

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLMN:

$2.21B

BABA:

$411.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLMN:

$219.65M

BABA:

$132.37B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLMN achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -14.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BLMN has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -8.73%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.31% annualized return.


BLMN

1D
1.12%
1M
-11.76%
YTD
-12.48%
6M
-24.69%
1Y
-21.69%
3Y*
-37.76%
5Y*
-25.16%
10Y*
-8.73%

BABA

1D
2.85%
1M
-12.94%
YTD
-14.41%
6M
-29.80%
1Y
-3.52%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
-10.05%
10Y*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLMN vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLMN
BLMN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLMN vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLMNBABADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

-0.08

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.07

0.23

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.03

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.10

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-0.24

-0.61

BLMN vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLMN and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLMNBABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

-0.08

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

-0.20

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

0.12

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.07

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between BLMN and BABA is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BLMN vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than BABA's 1.59% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
5.56%7.29%7.86%3.41%2.78%0.00%1.03%1.81%2.01%1.50%1.55%1.42%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.59%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BLMN vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLMN drawdown since its inception was -80.50%, roughly equal to the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLMN and BABA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BLMNBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.50%

-80.09%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.03%

-35.58%

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.50%

-74.12%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.50%

-80.09%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.98%

-58.34%

-21.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.33%

-37.23%

+9.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.71%

15.43%

+13.28%

Volatility

BLMN vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 12.47%. This indicates that BLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BLMNBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.66%

12.47%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.87%

29.36%

+14.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.26%

45.97%

+28.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.25%

51.12%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.27%

43.22%

+9.05%

Financials

BLMN vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
975.22M
280.91B
(BLMN) Total Revenue
(BABA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLMN vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
70.2%
40.2%
Portfolio components
BLMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 684.64M and revenue of 975.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.

BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 112.89B and revenue of 280.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

BLMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -13.30M and revenue of 975.22M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 18.44B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

BLMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -13.48M and revenue of 975.22M, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 16.16B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.