BLIN vs. MARK

In the year-to-date period, BLIN achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than MARK's -5.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BLIN having a -44.52% annualized return and MARK not far behind at -46.60%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN) and Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BLIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the MARK Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLIN and MARK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither BLIN nor MARK has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BLIN drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum MARK drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLIN and MARK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN) has a higher volatility of 50.76% compared to Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) at 31.07%. This indicates that BLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bridgeline Digital, Inc. and Remark Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.