PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLES vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLES vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


BLES

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.04%
YTD
11.95%
6M
12.47%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLES vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
11.95%19.25%5.59%16.47%-16.21%24.36%12.22%28.39%-13.43%15.23%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and VOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.82

The correlation between BLES and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLES vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLES
VOO

Industrials

16.3%
8.3%

Technology

15.6%
35.7%

Financial Services

10.3%
11.6%

Basic Materials

7.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

6.9%
1.9%

Healthcare

5.8%
8.5%

Energy

5.8%
3.5%

Utilities

5.5%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.9%

Communication Services

1.0%
11.3%

Industrials

BLES
16.3%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

BLES
15.6%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

BLES
10.3%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

BLES
7.8%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

BLES
6.9%
VOO
1.9%

Healthcare

BLES
5.8%
VOO
8.5%

Energy

BLES
5.8%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

BLES
5.5%
VOO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BLES
4.5%
VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

BLES
3.3%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

BLES
1.0%
VOO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLES vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES
BLES Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLESVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.16

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

14.73

-3.80

BLES vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLES Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLES and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLESVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.39

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.89

-0.35

Drawdowns

BLES vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLESVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-33.99%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-8.90%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

-18.69%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.61%

-24.52%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.70%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-3.69%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.91%

+0.27%

Volatility

BLES vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that BLES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLESVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

2.84%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

8.90%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

11.80%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.81%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

18.01%

+0.93%

BLES vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLES vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
1.77%1.97%1.90%1.80%1.64%9.28%1.61%2.16%1.73%2.01%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLES and VOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLES has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLES dropped -40.35% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 7.38% for BLES. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BLES.

BLES has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

BLES is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLES and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer