PortfoliosLab logo
BLE vs. NBH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLE and NBH is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BLE vs. NBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II (BLE) and Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund Inc. (NBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLE:

0.16

NBH:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

BLE:

0.22

NBH:

0.55

Omega Ratio

BLE:

1.03

NBH:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

BLE:

0.05

NBH:

0.11

Martin Ratio

BLE:

0.32

NBH:

0.89

Ulcer Index

BLE:

4.25%

NBH:

4.19%

Daily Std Dev

BLE:

11.25%

NBH:

10.89%

Max Drawdown

BLE:

-55.26%

NBH:

-43.51%

Current Drawdown

BLE:

-23.69%

NBH:

-29.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLE:

$484.91M

NBH:

$300.62M

EPS

BLE:

$0.24

NBH:

$1.73

PE Ratio

BLE:

42.33

NBH:

5.87

PEG Ratio

BLE:

0.00

NBH:

0.00

PS Ratio

BLE:

12.74

NBH:

11.03

PB Ratio

BLE:

0.86

NBH:

0.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLE:

$37.21M

NBH:

$8.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLE:

$30.96M

NBH:

$6.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

BLE:

$23.41M

NBH:

$17.48M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLE achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than NBH's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, BLE has outperformed NBH with an annualized return of 1.65%, while NBH has yielded a comparatively lower 1.04% annualized return.


BLE

YTD

-0.99%

1M

4.66%

6M

-3.67%

1Y

1.84%

5Y*

-0.16%

10Y*

1.65%

NBH

YTD

-0.76%

1M

4.27%

6M

-4.35%

1Y

3.81%

5Y*

-0.95%

10Y*

1.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLE vs. NBH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLE is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLE is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLE is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLE is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLE is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLE is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NBH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBH is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBH is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBH is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBH is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBH is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBH is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLE vs. NBH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II (BLE) and Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund Inc. (NBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the NBH Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLE and NBH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BLE vs. NBH - Dividend Comparison

BLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than NBH's 6.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BLE
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II
6.26%5.99%4.05%5.91%4.93%4.64%4.60%5.72%5.97%6.30%6.19%6.22%
NBH
Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund Inc.
6.13%5.33%4.50%6.14%4.89%4.93%4.86%6.04%5.53%5.54%5.73%5.47%

Drawdowns

BLE vs. NBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLE drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than NBH's maximum drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLE and NBH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BLE vs. NBH - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II (BLE) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund Inc. (NBH) at 3.67%. This indicates that BLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BLE vs. NBH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II and Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
18.29M
8.42M
(BLE) Total Revenue
(NBH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items