PortfoliosLab logo
BLE vs. IIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLE and IIM is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BLE vs. IIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II (BLE) and Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (IIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLE:

0.12

IIM:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

BLE:

0.28

IIM:

0.78

Omega Ratio

BLE:

1.04

IIM:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

BLE:

0.07

IIM:

0.26

Martin Ratio

BLE:

0.40

IIM:

1.56

Ulcer Index

BLE:

4.68%

IIM:

3.45%

Daily Std Dev

BLE:

11.48%

IIM:

10.24%

Max Drawdown

BLE:

-55.26%

IIM:

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

BLE:

-25.01%

IIM:

-16.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLE:

$475.36M

IIM:

$547.41M

EPS

BLE:

$0.24

IIM:

$0.45

PE Ratio

BLE:

41.50

IIM:

25.84

PEG Ratio

BLE:

0.00

IIM:

0.00

PS Ratio

BLE:

12.49

IIM:

12.40

PB Ratio

BLE:

0.85

IIM:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLE:

$37.21M

IIM:

$35.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLE:

$30.96M

IIM:

$22.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

BLE:

$23.41M

IIM:

$45.15M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLE achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than IIM's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BLE has underperformed IIM with an annualized return of 1.83%, while IIM has yielded a comparatively higher 3.06% annualized return.


BLE

YTD

-2.71%

1M

-0.76%

6M

-7.08%

1Y

1.40%

3Y*

-0.21%

5Y*

-2.13%

10Y*

1.83%

IIM

YTD

1.09%

1M

-1.55%

6M

-4.69%

1Y

5.10%

3Y*

0.06%

5Y*

1.10%

10Y*

3.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLE vs. IIM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLE is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLE is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLE is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLE is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLE is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLE is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IIM is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IIM is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IIM is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IIM is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IIM is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IIM is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLE vs. IIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II (BLE) and Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (IIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLE Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the IIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLE and IIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BLE vs. IIM - Dividend Comparison

BLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than IIM's 7.95% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BLE
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II
6.43%5.99%4.05%5.91%4.93%4.64%4.60%5.72%5.97%6.30%6.19%6.22%
IIM
Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust
7.95%6.58%4.72%5.87%4.51%4.48%4.61%5.43%4.99%5.52%5.20%5.49%

Drawdowns

BLE vs. IIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLE drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than IIM's maximum drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLE and IIM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BLE vs. IIM - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II (BLE) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (IIM) at 2.72%. This indicates that BLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BLE vs. IIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II and Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
18.29M
14.06M
(BLE) Total Revenue
(IIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLE vs. IIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II and Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
87.9%
27.6%
(BLE) Gross Margin
(IIM) Gross Margin
BLE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II reported a gross profit of 16.08M and revenue of 18.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.9%.

IIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust reported a gross profit of 3.88M and revenue of 14.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

BLE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II reported an operating income of 5.33M and revenue of 18.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.2%.

IIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust reported an operating income of -2.31M and revenue of 14.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -16.4%.

BLE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, BlackRock Municipal Income Trust II reported a net income of -671.95K and revenue of 18.29M, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.

IIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust reported a net income of 5.02M and revenue of 14.06M, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.