PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BLD vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BLD and FNGU is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

BLD vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TopBuild Corp. (BLD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-23.42%
33.11%
BLD
FNGU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLD:

-0.15

FNGU:

2.06

Sortino Ratio

BLD:

0.06

FNGU:

2.38

Omega Ratio

BLD:

1.01

FNGU:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

BLD:

-0.17

FNGU:

2.88

Martin Ratio

BLD:

-0.36

FNGU:

8.71

Ulcer Index

BLD:

16.72%

FNGU:

17.66%

Daily Std Dev

BLD:

39.79%

FNGU:

74.62%

Max Drawdown

BLD:

-52.26%

FNGU:

-92.34%

Current Drawdown

BLD:

-28.26%

FNGU:

-14.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLD achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 1.74% return.


BLD

YTD

10.40%

1M

1.11%

6M

-22.39%

1Y

-6.57%

5Y*

25.34%

10Y*

N/A

FNGU

YTD

1.74%

1M

-14.57%

6M

31.51%

1Y

156.73%

5Y*

51.15%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLD vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLD is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLD is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLD is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLD is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLD is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLD is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLD vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TopBuild Corp. (BLD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLD, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.152.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLD, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.062.38
The chart of Omega ratio for BLD, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.011.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLD, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.172.88
The chart of Martin ratio for BLD, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.368.71
BLD
FNGU

The current BLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLD and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.15
2.06
BLD
FNGU

Dividends

BLD vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLD nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BLD vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLD drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLD and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-28.26%
-14.57%
BLD
FNGU

Volatility

BLD vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TopBuild Corp. (BLD) is 10.96%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 25.22%. This indicates that BLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.96%
25.22%
BLD
FNGU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab