PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKR vs. BLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKR vs. BLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKR achieves a 46.20% return, which is significantly higher than BLK's -3.93% return.


BKR

1D
2.86%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
46.20%
6M
31.56%
1Y
80.35%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*

BLK

1D
3.20%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-3.93%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKR vs. BLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
46.20%13.39%23.11%18.58%25.96%19.03%-15.15%23.01%-30.43%-14.15%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
-3.93%6.55%29.29%17.86%-20.40%29.39%47.21%31.87%-21.59%21.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BKR and BLK is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2017

0.34

The correlation between BKR and BLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKR:

$65.85B

BLK:

$168.72B

EPS

BKR:

$3.14

BLK:

$38.89

PE Ratio

BKR:

21.07

BLK:

26.29

PS Ratio

BKR:

2.35

BLK:

6.40

PB Ratio

BKR:

2.98

BLK:

2.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKR:

$27.89B

BLK:

$25.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKR:

$6.57B

BLK:

$15.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

BKR:

$4.20B

BLK:

$9.79B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKR vs. BLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKR
BKR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BLK
BLK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKR vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKRBLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.06

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

0.25

+4.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

0.57

+14.14

BKR vs. BLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the BLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKR and BLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKRBLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

0.22

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.20

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.59

-0.35

Drawdowns

BKR vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKR drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, which is greater than BLK's maximum drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKR and BLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKRBLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.51%

-60.36%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-22.45%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.00%

-23.74%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.53%

-43.90%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

-14.08%

+9.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.12%

-11.93%

-10.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

9.79%

-4.31%

Volatility

BKR vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) has a higher volatility of 10.36% compared to BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) at 8.58%. This indicates that BKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKRBLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.36%

8.58%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.40%

20.79%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.51%

25.72%

+6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.98%

26.76%

+8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.09%

27.76%

+12.33%

Dividends

BKR vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison

BKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than BLK's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
1.39%2.02%2.05%2.28%2.47%2.99%3.45%2.81%3.35%56.42%0.00%0.00%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
2.09%1.95%1.99%2.46%2.75%1.80%2.01%2.63%3.08%1.95%2.41%2.56%

Financials

BKR vs. BLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baker Hughes Company and BlackRock, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00B6.50B7.00B7.50B20222023202420252026
6.59B
6.77B
(BKR) Total Revenue
(BLK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BKR vs. BLK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Baker Hughes Company and BlackRock, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
22.8%
81.4%
Portfolio components
BKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 6.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

BLK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.51B and revenue of 6.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

BKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported an operating income of 809.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

BLK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.

BKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a net income of 930.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.

BLK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKR and BLK have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKR has higher volatility (10.36%) compared to BLK (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKR dropped -73.51% vs BLK's -60.36%.

BKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKR and BLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer