BKMC vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
BKMC and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKMC is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both BKMC and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKMC or XMHQ.
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and XMHQ is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BKMC vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BKMC:
1.00
XMHQ:
1.01
BKMC:
1.43
XMHQ:
1.51
BKMC:
1.18
XMHQ:
1.18
BKMC:
1.97
XMHQ:
1.80
BKMC:
4.93
XMHQ:
4.31
BKMC:
3.10%
XMHQ:
4.29%
BKMC:
15.32%
XMHQ:
18.34%
BKMC:
-25.02%
XMHQ:
-58.19%
BKMC:
-7.48%
XMHQ:
-8.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 17.95% return.
BKMC
13.83%
-2.58%
9.50%
13.84%
N/A
N/A
XMHQ
17.95%
-2.66%
0.84%
17.02%
15.48%
11.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKMC vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKMC vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKMC vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than XMHQ's 4.94% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 4.94% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.64% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKMC vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is 5.13%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that BKMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.