BKLN vs. FALN
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN).
BKLN and FALN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKLN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2011. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. Both BKLN and FALN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKLN or FALN.
Correlation
The correlation between BKLN and FALN is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
BKLN vs. FALN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BKLN:
1.61
FALN:
0.54
BKLN:
2.09
FALN:
0.71
BKLN:
1.39
FALN:
1.10
BKLN:
1.70
FALN:
0.68
BKLN:
13.56
FALN:
3.59
BKLN:
0.32%
FALN:
0.80%
BKLN:
2.68%
FALN:
5.38%
BKLN:
-24.17%
FALN:
-29.22%
BKLN:
-2.54%
FALN:
-4.25%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKLN achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's -2.19% return.
BKLN
-1.92%
-2.22%
0.08%
4.43%
5.66%
3.37%
FALN
-2.19%
-4.20%
-2.28%
3.07%
7.98%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKLN vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKLN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKLN vs. FALN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BKLN
FALN
BKLN vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKLN vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison
BKLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than FALN's 6.46% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF | 8.33% | 8.41% | 8.59% | 4.93% | 3.11% | 3.56% | 4.84% | 4.52% | 3.50% | 4.54% | 4.12% | 4.12% |
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.46% | 6.24% | 5.37% | 5.08% | 3.40% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.98% | 3.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BKLN vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKLN drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLN and FALN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKLN vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) is 1.46%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that BKLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with BKLN or FALN
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Transactional Portfolio Use
I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.
The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?
EG
technical support
Marcus Crahan