PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKHY vs. RIGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKHY vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKHY vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
0.00%8.48%8.37%12.40%-10.97%4.75%17.83%
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
0.28%4.63%4.45%6.07%-5.72%1.93%9.54%

Returns By Period


BKHY

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.02%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*

RIGS

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
0.28%
6M
2.52%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
3.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKHY vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKHY vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKHY
BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

RIGS
RIGS Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKHY vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKHYRIGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

0.37

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

0.60

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.08

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.74

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.91

1.87

+7.04

BKHY vs. RIGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the RIGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKHY and RIGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKHYRIGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.37

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.29

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.45

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between BKHY and RIGS is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BKHY vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison

BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than RIGS's 4.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
7.73%7.33%7.34%8.67%6.59%6.78%4.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
4.84%4.84%4.49%3.48%2.71%2.47%3.77%3.87%4.54%4.45%4.46%3.61%

Drawdowns

BKHY vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, roughly equal to the maximum RIGS drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and RIGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKHYRIGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-15.31%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-5.18%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.89%

-9.03%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-2.15%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-1.60%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

2.05%

-1.22%

Volatility

BKHY vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) at 2.20%. This indicates that BKHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKHYRIGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

2.20%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

6.17%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.80%

10.15%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

7.47%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

7.74%

-0.30%