PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKF vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKF vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -8.49% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BKF has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 5.20%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.96% annualized return.


BKF

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
-8.49%
6M
-8.96%
1Y
0.89%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
-3.80%
10Y*
5.20%

VGT

1D
0.39%
1M
4.11%
YTD
28.03%
6M
26.85%
1Y
54.06%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
20.58%
10Y*
25.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKF vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
-8.49%22.30%9.24%1.27%-21.78%-11.87%16.52%22.93%-13.80%41.80%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
28.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BKF and VGT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2007

0.62

The correlation between BKF and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKF vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKF
VGT

Financial Services

23.9%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%
0.1%

Communication Services

12.3%
0.5%

Technology

9.6%
98.5%

Basic Materials

7.6%
0.0%

Industrials

7.5%
0.4%

Energy

6.9%
0.3%

Healthcare

5.0%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%

-

Utilities

3.7%

-

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

BKF
23.9%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BKF
18.4%
VGT
0.1%

Communication Services

BKF
12.3%
VGT
0.5%

Technology

BKF
9.6%
VGT
98.5%

Basic Materials

BKF
7.6%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

BKF
7.5%
VGT
0.4%

Energy

BKF
6.9%
VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

BKF
5.0%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

BKF
3.9%
VGT

-

Utilities

BKF
3.7%
VGT

-

Real Estate

BKF
1.3%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKF vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKF
BKF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKF vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKFVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.40

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

3.31

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

10.16

-10.01

BKF vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKF and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKF vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.29%

-54.63%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-16.40%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-27.23%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.94%

-35.07%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.20%

-35.07%

-14.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.89%

-4.18%

-21.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-7.95%

-20.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

5.34%

+0.50%

Volatility

BKF vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) is 4.85%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that BKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKFVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

10.66%

-5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

18.19%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

22.44%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

25.50%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

24.78%

-3.02%

BKF vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKF vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than VGT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
1.59%1.79%2.37%1.68%2.04%2.93%1.02%1.66%2.33%1.51%1.82%3.15%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.32%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKF and VGT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to BKF (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.96% vs 5.20% for BKF. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BKF has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.96% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BKF.

BKF has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.32% for VGT.

BKF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. BKF tracks MSCI BRIC Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKF and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer