BKF vs. VGT
BKF (iShares MSCI BRIC ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKF is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI BRIC Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BKF returned 5.20%/yr vs 25.96%/yr for VGT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKF charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
BKF vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -8.49% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BKF has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 5.20%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.96% annualized return.
BKF
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- -8.49%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- 0.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- -3.80%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
VGT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 6M
- 26.85%
- 1Y
- 54.06%
- 3Y*
- 31.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.58%
- 10Y*
- 25.96%
BKF vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF | -8.49% | 22.30% | 9.24% | 1.27% | -21.78% | -11.87% | 16.52% | 22.93% | -13.80% | 41.80% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 28.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKF and VGT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2007 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BKF and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BKF vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKF
VGT
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
BKF
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
BKF
VGT
Communication Services
BKF
VGT
Technology
BKF
VGT
Basic Materials
BKF
VGT
Industrials
BKF
VGT
Energy
BKF
VGT
Healthcare
BKF
VGT
Consumer Defensive
BKF
VGT
-
Utilities
BKF
VGT
-
Real Estate
BKF
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKF vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
BKF
VGT
BKF vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.40 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 3.31 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 10.16 | -10.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKF vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.29% | -54.63% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -16.40% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.60% | -27.23% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.94% | -35.07% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.20% | -35.07% | -14.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.89% | -4.18% | -21.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -7.95% | -20.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 5.34% | +0.50% |
Volatility
BKF vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) is 4.85%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that BKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 10.66% | -5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 18.19% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 22.44% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 25.50% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 24.78% | -3.02% |
BKF vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKF vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than VGT's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF | 1.59% | 1.79% | 2.37% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 1.66% | 2.33% | 1.51% | 1.82% | 3.15% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKF and VGT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to BKF (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.96% vs 5.20% for BKF. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BKF has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.96% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BKF.
BKF has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.32% for VGT.
BKF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. BKF tracks MSCI BRIC Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKF and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer