BKAG vs. VYM
BKAG (BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKAG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKAG returned 0.07%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for VYM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKAG charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
BKAG vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKAG achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return.
BKAG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
BKAG vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | 0.29% | 7.23% | 1.17% | 5.67% | -13.29% | -1.46% | 2.15% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 22.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKAG and VYM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.09 |
The correlation between BKAG and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKAG vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
BKAG
VYM
BKAG vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKAG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 2.56 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 3.65 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.46 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.93 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 14.76 | -9.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKAG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.56 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.83 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.51 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
BKAG vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKAG drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKAG and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKAG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -56.98% | +38.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -6.69% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.04% | -14.46% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.00% | -15.84% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -0.43% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -7.19% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.78% | -0.85% |
Volatility
BKAG vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) is 1.22%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that BKAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKAG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 2.77% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 7.67% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 10.28% | -6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 13.96% | -7.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.55% | 16.34% | -10.79% |
BKAG vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKAG has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKAG vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
BKAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | 4.24% | 4.17% | 4.26% | 3.33% | 2.49% | 1.55% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKAG and VYM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VYM has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to BKAG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKAG dropped -18.53% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 5-year performance, VYM leads with 11.48% vs 0.07% for BKAG. On fees, BKAG is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKAG is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VYM.
BKAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.
BKAG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while VYM is Dividend. BKAG tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKAG and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKAG and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer