PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BK vs. C
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BK and C is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

BK vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
31.70%
26.01%
BK
C

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BK:

2.92

C:

2.27

Sortino Ratio

BK:

4.09

C:

3.05

Omega Ratio

BK:

1.54

C:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

BK:

6.04

C:

0.70

Martin Ratio

BK:

23.91

C:

11.24

Ulcer Index

BK:

2.35%

C:

5.47%

Daily Std Dev

BK:

19.25%

C:

27.08%

Max Drawdown

BK:

-72.42%

C:

-98.00%

Current Drawdown

BK:

0.00%

C:

-79.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BK:

$59.78B

C:

$150.15B

EPS

BK:

$5.87

C:

$5.95

PE Ratio

BK:

14.19

C:

13.44

PEG Ratio

BK:

0.74

C:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

BK:

$13.59B

C:

$61.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BK:

$13.49B

C:

$61.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

BK:

$5.75B

C:

$24.65B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BK achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly lower than C's 13.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BK has outperformed C with an annualized return of 11.28%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 7.98% annualized return.


BK

YTD

8.41%

1M

7.30%

6M

32.48%

1Y

54.53%

5Y*

15.85%

10Y*

11.28%

C

YTD

13.64%

1M

15.61%

6M

26.32%

1Y

61.04%

5Y*

3.88%

10Y*

7.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BK vs. C — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BK is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BK is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BK is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BK is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BK is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BK is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

C
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of C is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of C is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of C is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of C is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of C is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of C is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BK vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BK, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.922.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for BK, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.093.05
The chart of Omega ratio for BK, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.541.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for BK, currently valued at 6.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.040.70
The chart of Martin ratio for BK, currently valued at 23.91, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0023.9111.24
BK
C

The current BK Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BK and C, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.92
2.27
BK
C

Dividends

BK vs. C - Dividend Comparison

BK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than C's 2.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
1.63%2.32%3.04%3.12%2.24%2.92%2.34%2.21%1.60%1.52%1.65%1.63%
C
Citigroup Inc.
2.73%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%0.07%

Drawdowns

BK vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BK drawdown since its inception was -72.42%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BK and C. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-79.44%
BK
C

Volatility

BK vs. C - Volatility Comparison

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) and Citigroup Inc. (C) have volatilities of 9.82% and 9.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.82%
9.40%
BK
C

Financials

BK vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab