BIV vs. UPRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO).
BIV and UPRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BIV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 5. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. UPRO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index (300%). It was launched on Jun 23, 2009. Both BIV and UPRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BIV or UPRO.
Key characteristics
| BIV | UPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.20% | 24.12% |
| 1Y Return | -2.95% | -7.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.43% | 11.99% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.63% | 21.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.32 | -0.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.89% | 63.14% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.95% | -76.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIV and UPRO is -0.20. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
BIV vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 24.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BIV has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 1.63%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
BIV vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than UPRO's 0.63% yield.
| TTM | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF | 3.32% | 2.43% | 3.54% | 3.16% | 3.03% | 3.26% | 3.13% | 2.85% | 3.70% | 4.99% | 5.53% | 6.86% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.63% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.35% | 0.22% | 0.07% | 0.05% |
BIV vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIV vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Ulcer Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF | -0.32 | ||||
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | -0.03 |
BIV vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIV drawdown for the period was -15.83%, higher than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -59.37%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for BIV and UPRO
BIV vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV) is 2.24%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 11.30%. This indicates that BIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.