BITO vs. YBTC
BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BITO returned -46.40% vs -40.21% for YBTC. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BITO vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -29.42% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -23.96% return.
BITO
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- -26.02%
- YTD
- -29.42%
- 1Y
- -46.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.17%
YBTC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- -20.57%
- YTD
- -23.96%
- 1Y
- -40.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.89B | $2.63B | $2.08B | |
| $1.21M | $1.11M | $1.55M |
BITO vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -29.42% | -11.19% | 102.57% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -23.96% | -4.23% | 55.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITO and YBTC is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between BITO and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITO vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
BITO
YBTC
BITO vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITO | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.87 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.35 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITO vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -48.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITO | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -48.84% | -29.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.47% | -48.84% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.32% | -44.47% | -6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.18% | -14.91% | -22.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.48% | 31.35% | +4.13% |
Volatility
BITO vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 7.65%. This indicates that BITO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITO | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 7.65% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.45% | 31.73% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.19% | 40.25% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.60% | 40.45% | +14.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.60% | 40.45% | +14.15% |
BITO vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BITO and YBTC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BITO vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.66%, less than YBTC's 80.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 47.47% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 80.99% | 76.04% | 44.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BITO and YBTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BITO has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to YBTC (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs YBTC's -48.84%.
On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -40.21% vs -46.40% for BITO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -40.21% return vs -46.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITO and YBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 80.99%, compared with 47.47% for BITO.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill.
YBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITO and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer