PortfoliosLab logo
BITO vs. QLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and QLD is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

BITO vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

BITO:

32.35%

QLD:

49.83%

Max Drawdown

BITO:

0.00%

QLD:

-83.13%

Current Drawdown

BITO:

0.00%

QLD:

-22.53%

Returns By Period


BITO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QLD

YTD

-13.98%

1M

14.33%

6M

-15.77%

1Y

8.78%

5Y*

25.80%

10Y*

25.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITO vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITO and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BITO vs. QLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BITO is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BITO is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BITO is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BITO is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BITO is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BITO is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QLD is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QLD is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QLD is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QLD is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QLD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QLD is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BITO vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

BITO vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

BITO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.26%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.90%0.11%0.19%

Drawdowns

BITO vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BITO vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...