PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIPC vs. ATO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BIPC vs. ATO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIPC achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than ATO's 1.53% return.


BIPC

1D
0.17%
1M
12.65%
YTD
-7.13%
6M
-10.06%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ATO

1D
-0.27%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
1.53%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIPC vs. ATO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
-7.13%18.32%4.74%
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
1.53%23.07%-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BIPC and ATO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BIPC:

$5.50B

ATO:

$28.24B

EPS

BIPC:

-$6.15

ATO:

$8.23

PS Ratio

BIPC:

1.40

ATO:

5.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIPC:

$3.63B

ATO:

$4.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIPC:

$2.30B

ATO:

$1.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIPC:

$2.59B

ATO:

$2.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIPC vs. ATO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIPC
BIPC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BIPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ATO
ATO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIPC vs. ATO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIPCATODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.13

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.90

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

3.06

-2.50

BIPC vs. ATO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the ATO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIPC and ATO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIPCATODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

0.73

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.52

-0.17

Drawdowns

BIPC vs. ATO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIPC drawdown since its inception was -29.77%, smaller than the maximum ATO drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIPC and ATO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIPCATODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.77%

-51.94%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.77%

-12.58%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.32%

-11.98%

-5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-8.56%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

3.70%

+6.68%

Volatility

BIPC vs. ATO - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) at 4.88%. This indicates that BIPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIPCATODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

4.88%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.44%

11.33%

+11.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.93%

15.45%

+12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.72%

18.57%

+11.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.72%

21.24%

+8.48%

Dividends

BIPC vs. ATO - Dividend Comparison

BIPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than ATO's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.30%2.15%2.36%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
4.28%3.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BIPC vs. ATO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation and Atmos Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
871.76M
1.96B
(BIPC) Total Revenue
(ATO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BIPC vs. ATO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation and Atmos Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
61.0%
0
Portfolio components
BIPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported a gross profit of 531.53M and revenue of 871.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.0%.

ATO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BIPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported an operating income of 510.82M and revenue of 871.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.6%.

ATO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 764.80M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

BIPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported a net income of -110.45M and revenue of 871.76M, resulting in a net margin of -12.7%.

ATO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a net income of 581.90M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIPC and ATO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIPC has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to ATO (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIPC dropped -29.77% vs ATO's -51.94%.

ATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIPC and ATO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer