BIPC.TO vs. CSU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BIPC.TO or CSU.TO.
Key characteristics
| BIPC.TO | CSU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -8.45% | 10.69% |
| 1Y Return | -26.08% | 37.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.20% | 26.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.80 | 1.68 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.19% | 21.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.82% | -25.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -35.08% | -5.62% |
Fundamentals
| BIPC.TO | CSU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$5.60B | CA$77.60B |
| EPS | CA$1.16 | CA$36.62 |
| PE Ratio | 36.58 | 99.99 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$2.50B | CA$8.41B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$1.34B | CA$2.32B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$2.02B | CA$1.60B |
Correlation
The correlation between BIPC.TO and CSU.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BIPC.TO vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BIPC.TO achieves a -8.45% return, which is significantly lower than CSU.TO's 10.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BIPC.TO vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BIPC.TO vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
BIPC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than CSU.TO's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIPC.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation | 3.63% | 3.27% | 1.97% | 1.05% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 2.84% | 31.30% | 7.53% | 8.63% | 10.78% | 19,020.03% | 19.05% | 29.24% |
Drawdowns
BIPC.TO vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIPC.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.82%, which is greater than CSU.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIPC.TO and CSU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BIPC.TO vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) at 6.87%. This indicates that BIPC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BIPC.TO vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities